메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이경용 (JC Mariott Hotel) 강근옥 (국립한경대학교)
저널정보
한국외식산업학회 한국외식산업학회지 한국외식산업학회지 제11권 제2호(통권 제27호)
발행연도
2015.6
수록면
31 - 40 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study surveyed that the analysis on the expectation factor and satisfaction with school work of culinary major students. When choosing a university or a major, the students considered their own choice to be most important. Whether a major was ‘suitable for the individual’ had the greatest influence on the students (3.59±1.146) and ‘individual’s grades’ was the most important factor in choosing a university (3.53±1.165). Furthermore, in response to ‘motive for choosing a major’, more males answered ‘potential future development’ as the motive than females with the t value of 3.802 (p<0.001). And, more females considered ‘tuition’ as the biggest factor in choosing a university than males with the t value of -2.157 (p<0.05). In analyzing the ‘change in expectation for culinary major before and after entrance’, there was a significant difference in ‘recognition of society’ and ‘fieldwork opportunity’ (p<0.05). The expectation for ‘recognition of society’ increased from 2.95±0.947 to 2.95±0.947 after entrance, whereas the expectation for ‘fieldwork opportunity’ was higher before entrance (3.27±1.124) compared to after entrance (3.38±1.046). The overall satisfaction of the current major was an average of 3.28±0.877. There were exceptionally higher satisfactions in ‘theoretical lecture’ (3.31±0.937), ‘interaction with professors’ (3.34±0.995), and ‘improved expertise’ (3.22±0.927) in each categories. According to regression analysis on these three categories, satisfaction of education (b=0.442, t=8.167***) displayed the highest relationship with the overall satisfaction of the major compared to personal development (b=0.172, t=3.290***) and interaction (b=0.172,t=3.290***).

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0