메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제23집
발행연도
2002.1
수록면
107 - 138 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the church history Arius is branded as the head of heresy. For it is handed down, that he degraded the Son of God to a creature. Without discussing the truth of the tradition, it is undoubted, that for him and his comrades the Son of God is not same with God in essence. Because of that it seems to be naturally right, that their thought is repelled from the eminent theologians in the 4th century, namely not only Athanasius but also the three Capadocians and their collegues. But their idea itself seems to have not been handled, namely unrelated with the dogma in the church. In other words it is not enough questioned, why and how they had to lay the Son of God under God in essence. Started from the interprtation of Proverb 8: 22 - 25 the Arians have insisted, that the Son of God has a cause for his essence, for he is the Son, namely the generated one. Then he can not be generated from the essence of God, but the will of God. For God is not generated but ungenerated. If he had been generated from the ungenerated God, then he could have been no more generated. Here it is cleared, that for the Arians the will don`t transmit the essence. Their idea of will can be accepted as new in the spiritual history, if their insist be not understood from the point of view, that the idea is insisted on relation with the Son of God. From Platon onwards the greek philosophy tried to show, that the Good as the Cause of all transcends the all in essence, though it gives the essence to the all, as if the Sun to all. For the middle Platonism it is Nous, for the Plotinos the One. But they could not demonstrate the transcendence of the One. For its will must transmit his essence. That was the power of the logic in the greek philosophy. Namely they insisted, that their God is rational. For him too there can be the unables. He can not be the cause of the bad, that is he is not omnipotential. On the one hand the greek philosophy tried to show the transcendence of God, on the other hand the rationality of God. It means, a decisive collision take place in their own thought. By the Arians the transcendence of God was logically demonstrated. Of course there were the conflicts between the Christianity and the greek philosophy caused from the difference of the idea of will. For the Christians had insisted, that God can do all, namely the omnipotence. For the greek philosophy this insistence seemed to prove, that God in Christianity is unrational(Porphyrios and Celsos). So the conflicts did not take place in relation of transcendence of God. For the first the Arians presented the will as the cause for the essential difference of the two beings, namely God and his Son or the creatures. But their idea of the will is logically supported not by their selves, but the Neo-Arians especially Eunomios of Cyzicos. By him it is very clear presented, why the will don,t transmit the essence of God. God is in essence ungenerated, namely unbiginning and unending. But his will can not be so. For the will is the principle of act. There can be no act without beginning and ending. By the Arians and the Neo-Arians it is clearly witnessed, that for God the will has to be separated from his essence. That is the ground of God,s transcendence from the all.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

그리스도人의 신앙과 아리우스 이단의 합리주의적 대항에 관한 고찰
金祥玉 신학전망 1980 .09
종교와 과학 담론의 문명사적 함의 : 화이트헤드의 종교와 과학을 중심으로
전철 신학논단 2017 .03
하느님은 자연법칙 속에서 어떻게 일하시는가?: 종교와 과학 간의 관계 이해
최재희 신학전망 2016 .12
로티 Rorty 의 프래그마티즘에 대한 몇몇 실천적 물음들
황설중 철학연구 2000 .12
판넨베르크의 성령론적 창조론
박찬호 창조론오픈포럼 2015 .08

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0