메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
郭次燮 (부산대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第201輯
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
203 - 230 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this essay is to survey how the historical writings have played an ideological role in modem western history from the Renaissance and the Reformation to the nationalistic nineteenth century. Since the end of the nineteenth century many historians have maintained the so~called 'myth of objectivity' that using the historical evidence it is possible to find the undoubted historical truth. Even now some historians still tend to believe that they themselves are the judges who decide what the historical truth is in the outside of history, rather than only the parts of history now in progress. To decide, however, whose historical interpretation is closer to the 'truth' depends on how many peer historians and popular readers support those ones as well as on whose facts are more certain and exact. This shows that the historical writings are not free of the power and ideology in their times. The modem western historical writings also were not exceptional. Sometimes they preceded their ages and sometimes fell behind them, but they have always been the parts of their ages. In this essay my emphasis lies upon the point that the substance of historical writing is, in a sense, not the evidence(fact) but historian's faith. In short, doing history is ultimately the act of faith, although based on the evidence.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002976811