메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
金賢植 (한양대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第200輯
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
665 - 690 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently, history has been such a hot subject of controversy, especially due to the so-called "the Postmodern Challenge." Because of postmodernism, which has been said to deny any form of knowledge, including history, no longer did people believe the possibility of objective method of inquiry, the progress in science, and even the very existence of truth itself. Hence a deep skepticism about the status of history and the validity of historical knowledge. In a word, history has been shaken right down to its scientific and philosophical foundations. As a result, there appears so many articles and books which, in unison, refute this postmodern 'nonsense', and thereby, firmly advocate the status of history as an objective knowledge. Telling the Troth about History by J. Appleby, L. Hunt, M. Jacob, The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language by A. Marwick are the good examples. Recently, a veteran Korean philosopher of history, Lee Han Gu, participated in this battle. By publishing a book named A Philosophy of Historiography: How will We Reproduce the Past?, he also tries to crush the postmodern skepticism and relativism to pieces, and thereby, to firmly secure the philosophical and scientific foundations of historical knowledge. But did he accomplish his aim? Did he succeed in advocating the validity of historical knowledge by his neo-realistic ideas heavily based on Karl Popper's theory? The main purpose of this article is to speculate on the proper status of history in the Postmodern Age by critically examining Lee's book on the philosophy of history. For this, his thoughts on key concepts such as historical objectivity will be thoroughly analyzed.

목차

Ⅰ. 역사이론계의 데자뷰와 ‘타는 목마름’
Ⅱ. 반가운 단비? 혹 또 다른 갈증?
Ⅲ. 역사와 철학의 화해를 위하여
Ⅳ. “더 큰 우정을 위하여”
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (6)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002972368