메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
충남대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 法學硏究 第14卷 第1號
발행연도
2003.6
수록면
315 - 337 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
For the execution of company business by directors, various management judgements are required. Directors venture on risk management. If they make an overall judgement by using the knowledge as a professional manager, it is necessary to hold legal judgement in suspense or to exempt them from personal liability in consideration of the uncertain and flexible elements of management judgement. Though directors of corporation make decisions in good faith, with due care, and for the best interests of the company, their decisions may lead to damage to the company because of unpredictable economic situation or passive, flexible factors. It is necessary to handle management failure differently from simple mistakes or liability with fault.
However, the introduction of Business Judgement Rule doesn't automatically recognize discretionary power in management for directors widely. Instead, action norms of directors are expected as a prior effect when Business judgement Rule is introduced. Also, the function to present legal norms of a court is expected as a post effect.
From this viewpoint, introducing Business judgement Rule to Korean commercial law in limitation can seek the profits of diverse people concerned around company. In addition, it presents criteria for the range of lawful discretionary power to directors, requiring directors' responsible management. Therefore, it needs to be examined positively.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 외국(미국ㆍ일본)에서의 논의
Ⅲ. 법령위반과 이사의 책임
Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 도입 필요성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018448702