지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Nowadays fragmentation of international law is not a new phenomenon because any state could contract a treaty or a agreement to deal with various problems. Fragmentation has made positive and negative effects in either international norms or jurisdictional aspects. Also recently more states prefer to enter into regional trade agreements such as free trade agreements(FTA). Therefore actually there are some disputes between states due to deference between WTO rules and regional trade agreement rules and this situation should not be avoided or overlooked. Especially, nondiscriminatory character of WTO/GATT safeguard is a major issue among WTO trade rules.
So This article will search causes and specific contents of fragmentation of safeguard, and several disputes claimed to WTO dispute settlement body and NAFTA panel. After that, what roles WTO could play in this situation will be studied to make move fragmentation of safeguard toward a positive direction. These roles mean the role of 'multilateral organization' and the role of 'dispute settlement body'.
In a few cases, one of points of disputes is a difference of safeguard requirement between regional trade agreements and WTO/GATT. Moreover GATT safeguard should be applied to any like product or directly-competing product on an MFN basis, if the increasing import causes serious injury or threat thereof. However regional trade agreement safeguard is applied to a like product or directly-competing product only if the increasing import would be substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof. Latter is discriminatory, former is not. Discriminatory nature has made non-implementation of the other obligation. This article tries to solve the problems arising from different nature of several safeguards and regards WTO as a proper organization because that provides a place for discussion among WTO members and has a systemic dispute settlement body. multilateral discussion and (either de facto or de jure)stare decisis of dispute settlement body should be noticed to induce positive results in circumstances of fragmentation of safeguard.
So This article will search causes and specific contents of fragmentation of safeguard, and several disputes claimed to WTO dispute settlement body and NAFTA panel. After that, what roles WTO could play in this situation will be studied to make move fragmentation of safeguard toward a positive direction. These roles mean the role of 'multilateral organization' and the role of 'dispute settlement body'.
In a few cases, one of points of disputes is a difference of safeguard requirement between regional trade agreements and WTO/GATT. Moreover GATT safeguard should be applied to any like product or directly-competing product on an MFN basis, if the increasing import causes serious injury or threat thereof. However regional trade agreement safeguard is applied to a like product or directly-competing product only if the increasing import would be substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof. Latter is discriminatory, former is not. Discriminatory nature has made non-implementation of the other obligation. This article tries to solve the problems arising from different nature of several safeguards and regards WTO as a proper organization because that provides a place for discussion among WTO members and has a systemic dispute settlement body. multilateral discussion and (either de facto or de jure)stare decisis of dispute settlement body should be noticed to induce positive results in circumstances of fragmentation of safeguard.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 세이프가드의 파편화
Ⅲ. WTO의 세이프가드 규범 성립에의 역할
Ⅳ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WTO세이프가드의 問題點
산업경제연구
1998 .11
-
FTA 세이프가드 규정의 WTO 세이프가드 규정 합치성 검토
국제경제법연구
2011 .05
-
세이프가드조치의 적법성 평가를 위한 심사기준의 적용에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2007 .06
-
미국의 철강 세이프가드 조치에 대한 WTO 분쟁 해결 사건
국제경제법연구
2005 .12
-
韓 · 中間의 세이프가드 關聯紛爭과 對應에 關한 硏究
통상법률
2002 .08
-
韓·中間 세이프가드 關聯紛爭의 展開에 따른 우리나라의 對應
무역상무연구
2004 .02
-
WTO 세이프가드 事件 分析
통상법률
2001 .10
-
중국 세이프가드제도에 관한 고찰
한국관세학회 학술대회
2007 .11
-
지역무역협정 세이프가드 규정의 차별성과 GATT 제24조 제한적 통상규칙
통상법률
2009 .08
-
WTO의 나아갈 길
통상법률
1997 .10
-
A Study on the New Dispute Settlement System of the GATT/WTO
국제법학회논총
1996 .06
-
중국 셰이프가드제도에 관한 고찰
관세학회지
2007 .12
-
AN ANALYSIS OF THE KEY PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT ON SAFEGUARDS : STRATEGIC APPROACH TO FOREIGN SAFEGUARD MEASURES ON KOREAN IMPORTS
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2002 .08
-
세계무역기구(WTO) 체제하의 일본 통상정책의 변화 : 후지·코닥 필름 분쟁을 중심으로
통상법률
2008 .06
-
WTO 분쟁해결 동향: 2015년
통상법률
2015 .12
-
WTO 분쟁해결 동향 : 2016년
통상법률
2016 .12
-
자유무역협정에 따른 세이프가드조치의 차별적 적용과 최혜국대우
통상법률
2010 .02
-
인도네시아 Safeguard규정에 관한 고찰
관세학회지
2003 .12
-
WTO 紛爭解決制度와 事例의 比較硏究
무역학회지
1999 .06
-
Harmonization of Trade and Environment through Judicial Interpretation of General Exceptions under the WTO
통상법률
2006 .04
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018390863