지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 221 - 246 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Historically, capital punishment is most often associated retribution. Korea has been continued to utilize capital punishment, but consistently posed the nation′s high homicide rates. In many public opinion survey in Korea more than 40 percent of the population favored the abolition of death penalty. Many people believe that death penalty serves to restrain people from committing murder, thereby sparing the lives of countless potential victims. For now a general deterrence effect to capital punishment have insufficient empirical support for the consecutive murder case. The sanctity of human life, which gives each person a right to life, is inconsistent with the practice of putting criminals to death. The practice of capital punishment causes trouble by the tragic fact that innocent people are sometimes executed. Capital punishment should be abolished since it is undignified, inhumane.
Life imprisonment is regarded by many as a humane alternative to the death penalty for the most serious crimes. In actually, a life sentence does not always mean imprisonment for life. In many nations a convicted prisoner can be paroled out of a life sentence after decade or more has passed. Critics of capital punishment sometimes argue on utilitarian grounds that the expense involving executions is substantially greater than the cost of life imprisonment. The cost of maintaining convicted murderers for duration of their lives frequently is cited as a factor in support of capital punishment. In some surveyor′s report, capital punishment process simply costs more than life imprisonment.
This article suggested that there is a better way to punish a consecutive murderer with life imprisonment instead capital punishment, Sooner or later we need laws on the adoption of life imprisonment. The prisoner sentenced to life imprisonment in particular a consecutive murderer must be served at least minimum term in order to eligible to parole. Release of prisoner on parole requires that this minimum time is served and that a psychological expert opinion finds further dangerousness for this prisoner and a positive social prognosis.
Life imprisonment is regarded by many as a humane alternative to the death penalty for the most serious crimes. In actually, a life sentence does not always mean imprisonment for life. In many nations a convicted prisoner can be paroled out of a life sentence after decade or more has passed. Critics of capital punishment sometimes argue on utilitarian grounds that the expense involving executions is substantially greater than the cost of life imprisonment. The cost of maintaining convicted murderers for duration of their lives frequently is cited as a factor in support of capital punishment. In some surveyor′s report, capital punishment process simply costs more than life imprisonment.
This article suggested that there is a better way to punish a consecutive murderer with life imprisonment instead capital punishment, Sooner or later we need laws on the adoption of life imprisonment. The prisoner sentenced to life imprisonment in particular a consecutive murderer must be served at least minimum term in order to eligible to parole. Release of prisoner on parole requires that this minimum time is served and that a psychological expert opinion finds further dangerousness for this prisoner and a positive social prognosis.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 우리나라에서의 사형대체형의 논의
Ⅲ. 종신형의 의의와 관련 입법례
Ⅳ. 종신형에 내재되어 있는 문제점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사형의 대안으로서 절대적 종신형 도입방안
형사정책연구
2006 .06
-
사형의 대체방안으로서 종신형제도에 관한 제 문제
교정연구
2015 .01
-
한국에서의 사형집행유예제도에 관한 논의
비교형사법연구
2007 .01
-
死刑制度의 存廢와 그 現實的 代案 : 絶對的 終身刑制 도입을 촉구하며
법학연구
2007 .02
-
사형폐지론의 입장에서 바라본 사형제도
한양법학
2010 .05
-
사형제도의 위헌성 고찰
법학연구
2010 .05
-
사형의 형벌적 특성에 관한 비판적 연구
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
大韓民國에서의 死刑制度
비교형사법연구
2004 .01
-
미국의 사형제도 개괄
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
사형대상 범죄의 합리적 축소방안
형사정책연구
2006 .06
-
사형제도의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .11
-
사형제도 존폐논쟁의 현황과 전망 - 이념논쟁과 국민정서
형사정책연구
2006 .06
-
生命權과 死刑制度
한양법학
2005 .06
-
사형제도 폐지에 관한 소고 : 헌법재판소 2010.2.25. 2008헌가23결정에 대한 비판적 검토
서강법률논총
2013 .02
-
사형제도의 형사 사법적 개선방안
교정연구
2013 .01
-
사형폐지의 길 - 동아시아에 있어 사형폐지에 관한 논고 -
동북아법연구
2019 .01
-
사형제도의 폐지와 대체형벌에 관한 소고 : 종신형의 도입과 피해자의 의사
형사정책연구
2010 .12
-
한국에 있어서의 사형범죄에 대한 수사·공판·집행절차
비교형사법연구
2007 .01
-
자유형규정의 개정방안
법학논집
2010 .01
-
사형제도의 합리적 축소정비방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0