메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법학회 법학연구 法學硏究 第20輯
발행연도
2005.11
수록면
23 - 49 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The death penalty as the ultimate sanction is the oldest penalty, but it has been used widely throughout history. Traditionally, we have had two main theories of punishment: retributivism and deterrence. Retributive theories are backward looking, focusing on the evil deed rather than on future consequences of the punishment. Deterrent theories are generally held by utilitarians who focus on future considerations, using punishment in order to correction deter or prevent future crimes.
Proponents of the death penalty attempt to justify it either from a retributive or utilitarian framework. Even if it were various disputes relate to preventive effects against crimes of the death penalty, this paper insists on the existence of death penalty, because I think that the death penalty a little will contribute to protection of society from a crime. But the death penalty should be made up for various systems which can be minimize its defects or vices. As a improvement directions of the death penalty, this paper proposes life imprisonment not as the substitute for the death penalty system but the supplementation. And I think that it is necessary reduction of the death penalty provisions, materialization of conditions to a death sentence and induction of the probation system on the death penalty etc.
Lastly I think that a criminal under sentence of death and side of a person killed as well as the nation should be able to select either death penalty or life imprisonment and whether the death penalty is also executive or not. And I think, it is necessary of induction that obligate lawyer's participation on Investigation procedure and unanimity system of judges when the death penalty is sentenced to the accused and decrease system from death penalty to life imprisonment automatically if a judge only oppose to sentencing the death penalty.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사형제도의 존폐론 현황
Ⅲ. 사형제도의 개선방안
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017572821