지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Researches on English modal auxiliaries so far have focused primarily on their forms and/or meanings. However, they are frequently used to show the speaker's purpose of utterance, opinion, or attitude toward the proposition expressed in the utterance.
The aim of this paper is to show that English speakers use auxiliaries to fulfill specific communicative goals in everyday conversation. Such goals might include giving an indirect order, blame, request, advice, permission or prohibition with the speaker's authority, doubt, commitment on the truth of the proposition expressed, etc.
We have found some discourse characteristics with which English modal auxiliaries are closely associated. Those are as follows: First, an auxiliary carries various meanings depending on the discourse context where it occurs. For example, 'should' has an obligation meaning in one context, and an inference meaning in another context. Second, an English modal auxiliary can be used in differentiated discourse contexts, which affects its discourse function. For instance, 'must' with a strong obligation meaning is used for indirect command, advice, requirement, etc. with the implication of the speaker's authority. 'Should' expressing a moral obligation or duty is used for cooperative suggestion. 'May' is used for either giving or asking personal permission. Third, a deontic modal auxiliary often functions as an epistemic marker. For example, 'must' is used to express the speaker's confident inference on the truth of the proposition expressed from the evidence available. 'Should' signals the speaker's tentative assumption of the truth of the proposition expressed. Fourth, there are some cases in which the functions of a modal auxiliary can be clarified by stress and intonation. For instance, the stressed 'may' with fall-rise intonation in "He tray leave tomorrow" functions as an epistemic modal marker with the meaning of inference. In contrast, the unstressed 'may' functions as a deontic modal marker with a permission meaning. Fifth, English modal auxiliaries tend to be chosen depending on the speaker's purpose of utterance such as command, advice, request, blame, suggestion, regret, complaint, doubt, etc.
In conclusion, English modal auxiliaries are closely associated with various discourse characteristics. Thus, it is strongly required to comprehensively and systematically study English modal auxiliaries from the discourse perspective.(Pusan University of Foreign Studies)
The aim of this paper is to show that English speakers use auxiliaries to fulfill specific communicative goals in everyday conversation. Such goals might include giving an indirect order, blame, request, advice, permission or prohibition with the speaker's authority, doubt, commitment on the truth of the proposition expressed, etc.
We have found some discourse characteristics with which English modal auxiliaries are closely associated. Those are as follows: First, an auxiliary carries various meanings depending on the discourse context where it occurs. For example, 'should' has an obligation meaning in one context, and an inference meaning in another context. Second, an English modal auxiliary can be used in differentiated discourse contexts, which affects its discourse function. For instance, 'must' with a strong obligation meaning is used for indirect command, advice, requirement, etc. with the implication of the speaker's authority. 'Should' expressing a moral obligation or duty is used for cooperative suggestion. 'May' is used for either giving or asking personal permission. Third, a deontic modal auxiliary often functions as an epistemic marker. For example, 'must' is used to express the speaker's confident inference on the truth of the proposition expressed from the evidence available. 'Should' signals the speaker's tentative assumption of the truth of the proposition expressed. Fourth, there are some cases in which the functions of a modal auxiliary can be clarified by stress and intonation. For instance, the stressed 'may' with fall-rise intonation in "He tray leave tomorrow" functions as an epistemic modal marker with the meaning of inference. In contrast, the unstressed 'may' functions as a deontic modal marker with a permission meaning. Fifth, English modal auxiliaries tend to be chosen depending on the speaker's purpose of utterance such as command, advice, request, blame, suggestion, regret, complaint, doubt, etc.
In conclusion, English modal auxiliaries are closely associated with various discourse characteristics. Thus, it is strongly required to comprehensively and systematically study English modal auxiliaries from the discourse perspective.(Pusan University of Foreign Studies)
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 양상조동사의 의미와 기능
Ⅲ. 요약과 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 정희자 / 2002 / 담화와 추론
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bybee, J / 1995 / Modality in Grammar and Discourse: An Introductory Essay. : 1 ~ 14
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Coates,J / 1983 / The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1995 / The Expression of Root and Epistemic Possibility in English. : 55 ~ 66
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Mariani / 1991 / English Grammar for Communication
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Bybee, J / 1995 / Modality in Grammar and Discourse: An Introductory Essay. : 1 ~ 14
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Coates,J / 1983 / The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries
[학술지(정기간행물)] - / 1995 / The Expression of Root and Epistemic Possibility in English. : 55 ~ 66
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Mariani / 1991 / English Grammar for Communication
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
세계 영어의 지역적 차이에 대한 말뭉치 분석연구
새한영어영문학
2007 .05
-
English Modal Auxiliaries on Grammaticalization Chain
언어과학연구
2002 .09
-
A Comparative Analysis of Grammaticalization in English and Korean Modal Auxiliaries
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .06
-
대응 분석을 통한 서법 조동사의 범언어적 분포 연구
인문언어
2018 .01
-
A corpus-based study on the weak obligation modals : Should, ought to and had better
영어학
2008 .06
-
A Multifactorial Analysis of Inner Circle Varieties : Focusing on Canadian Modal Auxiliaries
응용언어학
2017 .12
-
러시아어 양상술어의 발달에 작용한 문법화의 기제
슬라브학보
2008 .09
-
Comparisons of Must and Have-to from a Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective
언어과학연구
2003 .06
-
When 'No' Does not Mean 'No'
언어과학연구
2003 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 법성표현 대조연구
언어과학연구
1993 .12
-
영어 중첩 서법조동사의 통사적 구조
열린정신 인문학연구
2007 .06
-
유형론에서 본 영어의 양상
영어영문학21
2010 .01
-
DO 지원에 관한 통시적 연구
새한영어영문학
2000 .11
-
영어 양상조동사 습득에 나타난 문법-화용능력 관계 연구
언어과학
2017 .01
-
현대 미국영어 코퍼스에 나타난 서법 조동사와 부사연어 분석 연구
새한영어영문학
2011 .02
-
러시아어 인상술어에 대한 통사적 고찰: 양상조동사(modals)를 중심으로
외국학연구
2012 .01
-
Perception and Production of English Modal Verbs by Korean University Students in Written Academic Discourse
언어과학연구
2017 .06
-
영어조동사 do와 중세영어 문법변화에 대한 추론
언어과학
2012 .01
-
A Force-Dynamic Approach to Modal Auxiliaries in English
영어학
2017 .03
-
Modal Categories and Dynamic Modality in English
영어학
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
N. T. 라이트의 칭의론에 대한 개혁신학적 평가
박동근
신학정론
2016
.05
Some Thoughts on Discourse markers
Changyong Yang
영어영문학
2003
.12
So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker Used by Korean Speakers in English Conversation
Ahn
,
Soojin
언어과학연구
2015
.12
Analysis of the Discourse Function and Semantic of the Discourse Marker Cto
Soon Cheon Eom
언어과학연구
2014
.06
[이 책을 말한다] 오늘의 교회와 신앙인에게 보내는 또 하나의 서신 : 톰 라이트의『모든 사람들을 위한 목회서신』IVP
임진수
기독교사상
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0