메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 企業法硏究 第21卷 第1號
발행연도
2007.3
수록면
395 - 415 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The patent right is exclusive. So in the case of patent infringement patentee can demand reparation for the injury. Especially in Patent Act the special provisions are regulated on the compensation for patent infringement so as to lighten the burden of proof for damages.
In Article 130, Presumption of Negligence is prescribed: A person who has infringed a patent right or exclusive license of another person shall be presumed to have been negligent regarding such act of infringement.
And Presumption, etc. of Amount of Damages is prescribed in Article 128.
In this paper, I would like to study on Section 3, 4 and 5 of Article 128, because I studied on Section 1 and 2 of Article 128 in the previous Business Law Review No.4, Vol.19.
Section 3 of Article 128 prescribes as the following: Where a patentee or exclusive licensee claims compensation for damages from a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed a patent right or exclusive license, the pecuniary amount which he would normally be entitled to receive for the working of the patented invention may be claimed as the amount of damage suffered by the patentee.
And Section 4 of Article 128 prescribes as the following: Notwithstanding Section 3, where the amount of actual damages exceeds the amount referred to in Section 3, the amount in excess may also be claimed as compensation for damage. In such a case, the court may take into consideration the fact that there has been neither willfulness nor gross negligence on the part of the person who has infringed the patent right or the exclusive license when awarding damages.
And Section 5 of Article 128 prescribes as the following: In litigation relating to a patent right or exclusive license, where the court recognizes that the nature of the facts of the case makes it difficult to provide evidence proving the amount of damage that has occurred, the court may determine a reasonable amount on the basis of an examination of the evidence and on a review of all the arguments, notwithstanding Section 1 through 4.

목차

Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 실시료상당액에 의한 손해배상
Ⅲ. 실시료상당액을 초과한 손해의 배상
Ⅳ. 법원에 판단에 의한 손해액의 인정
Ⅴ. 결
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-016572196