지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In relation with the theory of overcoming modern, we should notice that the overcoming-theorists of modern stipulate the Greater East Asia War as the Common Sphere's All-out War beyond totalized war. This notion generates an unusual imperialism. In discussing the specific relationship between Japan and China which is represented as Manchuria, they emphasize that the relationship is different from the imperialistic relationship based on the existing nationalism. The relationship of Japan and China is very special one through the intermediation of a sphere of life, they say, which is different from the past imperialistic relationship based on the constant of the resources and market. Also, the overcoming-theorists extend the space notion into the field of life, relating internally the space notion at the end of Japanese ruling with historical value beyond the just geographical relation. And thus, in comparison with the fact that the expansion history of European imperialism is a specific world history heightgning the dependency on the outer region of Europe, they set up the relation of Japan and China not as a subjunctive one but as an equal one, describing their relationship as that of sphere of life. This setting is a kind of mythomania for joining the East Asia's nations into the Greater East Asia War.
Goyama Iwao said that, from the view of world history, Japan's position on China is "not imperialistic". This thinking is common thinking of Japanese at that time. The advance of Japan into the East Asia is a mission in the history of world, that is, Japan's stopping from China's split, and also, the only means that Asia can go beyond the restriction of position in the history of world. These thinkings are an universal level of recognition of Japanese at that time.
Because such universal thinking is in the deep heart of Japanese, 'Ideal of the Greater East Asia War', Japanese believes, justifies the past relationship of Japan and China. If we can call the power which can make Japanese have such thinking 'morallish-energie', a moral principle of the overcoming-theorists of modern is a very specific philosophical logic. They insist that the Japan's measures on China are different from those of the western imperialism because they overcome imperialism ideally just in the case of Construction of the Greater East Asia, though the measures have a leg 'to be misunderstood as an imperialistic ones'. In the inner heart of their persistence, firm and sometimes gruesome self-confidence or belief reside. That's just the moral power, and the mind of Tenno. Therefore, 'morallish-energie' which the overcoming-theorists of modern assert is a mere philosophical slogan to rationalize the Greater East Asia War.
Goyama Iwao said that, from the view of world history, Japan's position on China is "not imperialistic". This thinking is common thinking of Japanese at that time. The advance of Japan into the East Asia is a mission in the history of world, that is, Japan's stopping from China's split, and also, the only means that Asia can go beyond the restriction of position in the history of world. These thinkings are an universal level of recognition of Japanese at that time.
Because such universal thinking is in the deep heart of Japanese, 'Ideal of the Greater East Asia War', Japanese believes, justifies the past relationship of Japan and China. If we can call the power which can make Japanese have such thinking 'morallish-energie', a moral principle of the overcoming-theorists of modern is a very specific philosophical logic. They insist that the Japan's measures on China are different from those of the western imperialism because they overcome imperialism ideally just in the case of Construction of the Greater East Asia, though the measures have a leg 'to be misunderstood as an imperialistic ones'. In the inner heart of their persistence, firm and sometimes gruesome self-confidence or belief reside. That's just the moral power, and the mind of Tenno. Therefore, 'morallish-energie' which the overcoming-theorists of modern assert is a mere philosophical slogan to rationalize the Greater East Asia War.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 근대초극론에서의 ‘생활권’의 의미
Ⅲ. 근대초극론에서의 ‘모랄리쉬 에네르기’의 의미
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
아시아-태평양전쟁과 조선의 위상 변동 - 인문사 편집부 편, 「대동아전쟁과 반도」를 중심으로
日本學硏究
2011 .01
-
The Global and Regional Constitution of Nations: The View from East Asia
동양학
2008 .01
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
전쟁과 폭력에 대한 기독교 현실주의적 이해
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
7세기 동북아 전쟁에 대한 연구동향과 과제 : 고구려와 수, 당의 전쟁을 중심으로
역사문화논총
2014 .08
-
1차 세계대전의 교훈과 동아시아 국제정치
역사비평
2014 .08
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
Nationalism and Colonialism in Japan’s “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere” in World War Ⅱ
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2005 .06
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
The Strategy for One Korea, and the Third War
신학논단
1994 .06
-
망각의 공동체와 기억의 소설적 의미-황순원의 〈나무들 비탈에 서다〉 연구-
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-001-016502910