지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In a war, all kinds of evil behaviors are justified as the means of war and the healthy moral value judgements are mostly ignored. Ruskin once said in his article, "War," "War is the foundation of all of the great arts."
Traditionally, there have been three theological views on war. The first one is the view of the Quakers. They insist absolute peace and reject any kind of violence and war. The second one is the idea of 'holy war.' It usually appears in the Old Testament. Conservative Christians often call this 'the war of Jehova / Yaweh.' The third one is he view if 'just war.' St. Augustine and St. Thomas had this point of view. However, it does not mean that they accepted all kinds of wars md means used. They only recognized the wars and the use of forces which had just causes as the just and acceptable ones.
All of the three traditional theories have weaknesses. They conflict against each other at some points. People, according to their back-grounds, may prefer one but have difficulties to accept others. My position, however, is not on pointing out the weaknesses of the theories. Rather, by recognizing the unavoidable situations the theories had, I will focus more on the realistic understanding of war. I do this because Christian realism accepts the finitude of human individuals and groups, thus, instead of falling into idealism, it tries to solve the problems of human community by transforming and changing the institutional and social structures.
Traditionally, there have been three theological views on war. The first one is the view of the Quakers. They insist absolute peace and reject any kind of violence and war. The second one is the idea of 'holy war.' It usually appears in the Old Testament. Conservative Christians often call this 'the war of Jehova / Yaweh.' The third one is he view if 'just war.' St. Augustine and St. Thomas had this point of view. However, it does not mean that they accepted all kinds of wars md means used. They only recognized the wars and the use of forces which had just causes as the just and acceptable ones.
All of the three traditional theories have weaknesses. They conflict against each other at some points. People, according to their back-grounds, may prefer one but have difficulties to accept others. My position, however, is not on pointing out the weaknesses of the theories. Rather, by recognizing the unavoidable situations the theories had, I will focus more on the realistic understanding of war. I do this because Christian realism accepts the finitude of human individuals and groups, thus, instead of falling into idealism, it tries to solve the problems of human community by transforming and changing the institutional and social structures.
목차
Abstract
1. 들어가는 말
2. 정당전쟁론의 대두
3. 자크 엘룰의 폭력 이해
4. 기독교 현실주의적 인식의 필요성
참고 문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
서양 중세의 정의로운 전쟁 : 11세기의 평화론과 전쟁론을 중심으로
역사학보
2012 .12
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
전쟁할 때와 평화할 때
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .10
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
The Strategy for One Korea, and the Third War
신학논단
1994 .06
-
망각의 공동체와 기억의 소설적 의미-황순원의 〈나무들 비탈에 서다〉 연구-
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
Literature After the Korean War
Korea Journal
1977 .06
-
사상심리전의 텍스트로서 한국전쟁 : 자유세계로의 확산과 동아시아적 귀환
역사비평
2017 .02
-
한국전쟁기 38선 북진과 냉전의 고착화
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
한국소설에 나타난 베트남 전쟁의 특성과 참전 한국군의 정체성
한국현대문학연구
2003 .12
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
한국전쟁과 여성 : 경계에 선 여성들
역사비평
2010 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-230-015292485