지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Though land reclamation was carried out on a large scale, the study has not been satisfactorily performed that concretely explicates conditions of location of the land under cultivation due to lack of related data. Thus, this study tries to grasp geographical and ecological properties of the land under reclamation by examining the aspects of invasion of wildlife's habitats. For this, we investigate tigers and leopards that were ranked the highest in the ecosystem, about which there are many documents in Choseon Wangjo Sillok. That is to say, we examine properties and actualities of the reclamation policy in early Choseon by investigating the relationship between tigers' habitats and farm lands, the physiocratic nature of the tiger-hunting policy, and types of the tiger-hunting policy and their results in early Choseon.
Habitats that were preferred by tigers were those regions in those conditions of location in which people could easily cultivate the land. At the beginning of Choseon, tigers and leopards used to inhabit uncultivated fieldsin many cases. Later, the animals moved to mountain areas from ground and hill areas as the reclamation policy driven by the government had begun to show fruitful results on the days of King Sejong and King Seongjong. Since the 16th century, tigers had had as their habitats regions in which people didn't live, and had invaded humans' residential areas when they suffered from lack of foods. In the middle and late 16th century, the animals' habitats happened to reduce to graveyards and big mountain ranges. This paradoxically shows that the people actively cultivated farm lands to destroy the animals' habitats.
Choseon drove the tiger-hunting policy based on the physiocracy derived from Maengja's democracy. Intellectuals in Koryeo thought that tigers and humans could live in harmony because they had their own habitats respectively. However, Jeong Do-Jeon, who established the ideology of the foundation of Choseon based on Maengja's democracy, believed wild beasts to be hunted by humans. In early Choseon, kings hunted tigers on their own, and politically encouraged the hunting. Not only did they regard tigers as killing humans and cattle to do harm to farming, but called the animals "devil beasts" because they ruined crops.
In early Choseon, the government drove the tiger-hunting policy as a way of supporting the physiocracy. Kings carried out activities of tiger-hunting while they led military drills like the art-of-war training. Furthermore, they appointed some military officers as Chakhogapsa (officer of tiger-hunting) in the central army, and as Cakhoin (personnel of tiger-hunting) in order to secure military power supporting the tiger-hunting policy. They also formulated Pohojeolmok (rules of tiger-hunting) for encouraging the activity of tiger-hunting, and administered Hopigongnapje (tributary payment of tiger skin) in order to check the fruits of the tiger-hunting policy. As a result of the tiger-hunting policy systematically driven by the government, the number of the wild beasts had reduced remarkably, and various discourses with regard to the activity of tiger-hunting had been made among folks.
Therefore, the tiger-hunting policy, driven in early Choseon, contributed to the extension of land reclamation and the development of productivity in agriculture as it had been continuously driven with the clear ideological direction to the physiocracy.
Habitats that were preferred by tigers were those regions in those conditions of location in which people could easily cultivate the land. At the beginning of Choseon, tigers and leopards used to inhabit uncultivated fieldsin many cases. Later, the animals moved to mountain areas from ground and hill areas as the reclamation policy driven by the government had begun to show fruitful results on the days of King Sejong and King Seongjong. Since the 16th century, tigers had had as their habitats regions in which people didn't live, and had invaded humans' residential areas when they suffered from lack of foods. In the middle and late 16th century, the animals' habitats happened to reduce to graveyards and big mountain ranges. This paradoxically shows that the people actively cultivated farm lands to destroy the animals' habitats.
Choseon drove the tiger-hunting policy based on the physiocracy derived from Maengja's democracy. Intellectuals in Koryeo thought that tigers and humans could live in harmony because they had their own habitats respectively. However, Jeong Do-Jeon, who established the ideology of the foundation of Choseon based on Maengja's democracy, believed wild beasts to be hunted by humans. In early Choseon, kings hunted tigers on their own, and politically encouraged the hunting. Not only did they regard tigers as killing humans and cattle to do harm to farming, but called the animals "devil beasts" because they ruined crops.
In early Choseon, the government drove the tiger-hunting policy as a way of supporting the physiocracy. Kings carried out activities of tiger-hunting while they led military drills like the art-of-war training. Furthermore, they appointed some military officers as Chakhogapsa (officer of tiger-hunting) in the central army, and as Cakhoin (personnel of tiger-hunting) in order to secure military power supporting the tiger-hunting policy. They also formulated Pohojeolmok (rules of tiger-hunting) for encouraging the activity of tiger-hunting, and administered Hopigongnapje (tributary payment of tiger skin) in order to check the fruits of the tiger-hunting policy. As a result of the tiger-hunting policy systematically driven by the government, the number of the wild beasts had reduced remarkably, and various discourses with regard to the activity of tiger-hunting had been made among folks.
Therefore, the tiger-hunting policy, driven in early Choseon, contributed to the extension of land reclamation and the development of productivity in agriculture as it had been continuously driven with the clear ideological direction to the physiocracy.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 호·표의 서식환경과 농경지
Ⅲ. 포호정책의 농본주의적 필요성
Ⅳ. 포호정책의 시행과 성과
Ⅴ. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Tiger
Korea Journal
1990 .01
-
韓國 民間信仰에 나타난 虎의 存在와 그 象徵
어문론집
2011 .07
-
호랑이 설화를 통한 서사 만들기의 의의
어문학
2006 .09
-
『조선동화집』 수록 동화의 부정적 호랑이像 偏載 현황과 원인
어문연구
2008 .01
-
중국 고대 호랑이 신앙 연구
비교민속학
2008 .02
-
조선시기 한국인과 한국범의 관계 변화
역사와 담론
2011 .04
-
호랑이의 문학적ㆍ조형적 형상화 : 서사와 회화를 중심으로
우리말글
2009 .12
-
[문학 · 문화학] 한국 호랑이의 문화 상징적 가치와 의미
국제언어문학
2019 .04
-
어떤 소리를 들을 것인가 : 영화 〈The Woman, the Orphan, and the Tiger〉
HOMO MIGRANS
2012 .07
-
한국 호랑이 그림에 대한 一考察
비교민속학
2004 .02
-
동물담의 웃음 유발 방식과 특성 : 바보 호랑이 설화를 중심으로
어문론집
2015 .06
-
17세기 호속목제 시행의 생태경제사적 요인
역사와현실
2013 .12
-
The Korean Tiger : Trickster and Servant of the Sacred
Korea Journal
1981 .11
-
〈호랑이 報恩〉 說話에 나타난 對極과 統合의 原理
동아인문학
2008 .06
-
민담(民譚)에 나타난 호랑이 고찰(考察)
동악어문학
1996 .12
-
金圣叹≪水浒传≫批评中的龙虎意象
중국어문학
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015593876