메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전남대학교 5.18연구소 민주주의와 인권 민주주의와 인권 제1권 2호
발행연도
2001.10
수록면
361 - 394 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
At the century's end, societies all over the world are moving from authoritarian rule to democracy. Revolutionary political change challenges the paradigms used to understand and legitimate law in ordinary times. How should tansitional democracies cope with gross violations of human rights by prior regimes? State practice ranges from a polley of forgive and forget"(dean break model) to policies of vigorous prosecution (criminal prosecution model). The middleground between two models is reconciliation model. In Korea 1980 the coup of Chun and Roh led to bloody conflicts in tbe city of Kwangju. As a consequence of its violent seizing of power and its close links with the Park regime, the authoritarian regimes of Chun and Roh found themselves in a crisis of legitimacy from the very outset. Since a corruption scandal involving Chun and Roh was disclosed in mid - November 1995, the new civil government of Y.S.Kim finally agreed, following pressure from the public at large, to instigate criminal proceedings against Cbun and Roh in conjunction with their bloody past Parliament adopted statute of limitation Act and Korean Court deemed all activities to seize power, even if they were formally legalized at a later date, to be acts of high treason. But in December 1997 Y.S. Kim pardoned Cbun and Roh. The pardon was to be an expression of national reconciliation particularly against the backdrop of the severe economic crisis in Korea and the surrounding region. In summing up, the case of Korea belongs to the relative clean break model, in which the criminal prosecution coping with the past played a role as a conduct rule for citizen, while pardon played a role as decision rule for Judiciary. In order to make the role of criminal prosecution clear, the bloody incident in Kwangju should have been focused in criminal proceedings.

목차

1. 서론

2. 한국의 5·18 과거청산의 개요

3. 과거청산모델의 국제비교

4. 결론: 한국의 5·18 과거청산모델의 의의 및 과제

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-013784634