메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 122호
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
15 - 43 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
President Roh Moo-hyun was elected owing, in large part, to the Korean people's strong desire of ending the ancient regime in Korean politics in December 2002. Furthermore, his presidency could be restored from the political crisis caused by the National Assembly voted to impeach Roh Moo-hyun for illegal electioneering and incompetence charges only by the people's power to have made the Constitutional Court overturn the impeachment decision on May 14, 2004. Despite the fact that his presidency can be sustained only under the condition of popular support to indicate the state of ungovernability and legitimacy crisis.
Unfortunately, however, it is doubtful that the present situation can be overcome with the Roh regime's redirection of political and economic reforms. Although the decline of Roh regime was caused by many factors, it is plausible to argue that the most important factor to cause the rapid decline of Roh regime is its neoliberal economic policy to deteriorate the middle and lower classes' economic life by deepening the income and poverty polarization. The Roh government has implemented economic policies to deepen income and poverty polarization between the upper class and middle and lower classes even if Roh loudly declared his strong commitment to distributional justice and chaebol reform during the early period of his presidency. More specifically, President Roh adopted an economic policy to boost real estate market for facilitating economic growth right after his inauguration, which resulted in the rapid increase of real estate prices and household debts. While this policy made people rich in assets get speculative gains from real estate price bubble, it widened tremendously the gaps between the wealthy and poor and deepened the economic polarization between them. Against this policy, over 90% of the Korean people contended that the government should block speculative gains through enhancing the transparency of housing supply price as well as raise ownership tax to redeem speculative gains from rising real estate prices.
The Roh government's neoliberal view of economic policy, however, failed to respond such popular request and as a consequence, paved its way towards a considerable decline in popularity and legitimacy. The rise and decline of Roh government is the most corresponding example for a failed reformist government which lost its political support base by abandoning its original electoral constituents and fuzzing its economic identity based on the middle and lower classes. We will finally obseve what is the reactionary effect of the failed participatory government in the next presidential election in 2007.

목차

Ⅰ. 여당 고위인사와의 일문일답

Ⅱ. 참여정부의 배신, 부동산 경기부양 올인

Ⅲ. 참여정부 ‘최악의 경제성적표‘, 빈부 양극화

Ⅳ. 노대통령의 ‘6ㆍ9 발언‘, 신자유주의의 극치

Ⅴ. 정치 일극화가 초래한 경제 양극화

Ⅵ. 노동단체 - 시민단체 - 언론의 책임

Ⅶ. 아탈리의 미테랑 회고

Ⅷ. ‘암묵적 지식‘이 결여된 한국

Ⅸ. “다음 대선의 최대 이슈는 ‘빈부 양극화‘일 것“

Ⅹ. 루즈벨트 “특권계급의 증오를 환영한다“

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015194312