지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Today, the reason why the prosecution is pegged as an object of reformation is that the prosecution fails to clear off its past history that it neglected its duty and that it was appropriated for other purposes. In the process of preparing the statute criminal procedure law, to remedy the malformed prosecution power, especially a misuse and an abuse of the authority to prosecute, a system of application for a ruling was created.
However, neglecting the system and leaving it not to function well through a revision of criminal procedure law for the worse, the prosecution has brought the system to its knees. Moreover, the appeal system that the prosecution is for itself internally preparing as a control scheme also has had obvious limits, and the checks by constitutional trials also have not surpassed the symbolic meanings because of various restrictions. However, after getting out of authoritarianism, our society, on the road to democracy, achieved people’s participation in criminal trials, and, even though nobody can easily prejudge how situations of future discussions will evolve,it is obvious that people’s control over the prosecution’s authority to prosecute is in anyway inevitable.
Therefore, if, ruminating on the true implied meaning of people’s participation,the prosecution want to re-start as a trustworthy government institution, it should run concurrently the existing system of ex post control as well as the system of ex ante control in which people directly participate.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0