메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신양균 (전북대학교)
저널정보
동아대학교 법학연구소 동아법학 東亞法學 第44號
발행연도
2009.8
수록면
445 - 471 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Criminal Mediation is the procedure, which resolve conflicts caused by offences and reintegrate legal community by means of mediation and dialogue between criminal offenders and victims. Criminal Consensus is similar with criminal mediation, but the former has been developed customarily to resolve criminal conflicts by civil methods and is not based on the idea of restorative justice. In our country many people are accused by victim or third persons against criminal cases and it makes cost of criminal justice increased, therefore to minimize a side effect of accusation shall criminal justice agencies develop ADR(=Alternative Dispute Resolution) such as criminal mediation or reconciliation.
On the other hand, because traditional criminal policy oriented to rehabilitation of offenders exposed its limits on criminal measures and crime rates rised explosively since the mid 20 century, it grows interest in criminal victims, the nation has also interest in protection of criminal victims. A main issue of the protection is recovery of suffers or damages and voluntary mediation between offender and victim to restore damages play an important role in criminal procedure.
In Korea has two mediation system in criminal cases generally, pretrial mediation and criminal conclusive effect to reconciliation between the person concerned, but the former is the criminal mediation in real meaning, in that the third party, the Support Center for Criminal Victims, has an advisory role in reconciliation between the parties and reconciliation has (restrictive) nonnative effect.
From legislative aspect our criminal mediation system shall be more systemized according to levels and contents, and it requires practical plan to secure its legal effect.

목차

1. 도입
2. 형사화해제도의 의의
3. 현행법상 화해제도
4. 기소전 화해제도(형사중재제도)에 대한 검토
5. 전망
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002240046