메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법무정책연구원 형사정책연구원 연구총서 연구총서 04-33
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
9 - 133 (126page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently the issue whether so called anti human rights crime or concealing, manipulating the evidence of these acts by government agencies could be the object of nonpunishment by reason for prescription of prosecution in criminal procedure law, is taking growing interest. The legislator as well as the NGO and the public are calling upon the government making the special law ruling out application of the current provision.
The prescription of prosecution in current criminal system have the positive rolls and contribute to the legal stability. On the other hand, it is also true that it causes the unfair in the criminal charges and result in the distrust of the public. The most important thing in this thesis is not just abolishing of the institution like this prescription of prosecution, but how the justice could be restored.
In this connection, here the research results are following
Firstly, those acts like the torture and murder by government agencies are anti human rights, so the appropriate measures against those acts have to be taken. Just for the reason of prescription of prosecution those acts couldn't be remained nonpunishment.
Secondly, the crimes as the object of exclusion of the prescription of prosecution must be made clearance. This includes the anti human rights crimes by government agencies and anti humanity crimes, for example war crime and massacre etc.
Thirdly, recently our government ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, so we need the performance law legislation followed by ratifing the Rom Statue. In this connection it could be better not reform of criminal procedure law as legislatory form, but unifing both the performance law legislation and special law for exclusion the prescription of prosecution.

목차

국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 현행 공소시효제도와 그 문제점
제3장 공소시효제도와 소급효금지원칙
제4장 공소시효제도개선을 위한 입법방향
제5장 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003835438