지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is to examine the nation-state building in Korean modern history focusing on the sovereign power. Most researches has often regarded the sovereign power as an obstacle to nation-state building. But as Korean history has maintained several centralized dynasties for fifteen centuries and more, the sovereign of Korea after the Kabo Reform could function as a powerful centripetal force in nation-state building based on that "proto-nationalistic" loyalty.
lnitially, the principles of state building introduced in the Kabo Reform was to restrict the sovereign power to the extreme and create a new type of homogeneous people that were supposed to be loyal to the sovereign and patriotic to the state at the Same time. For that purpose, several projects were carried out: the establishment and proclamation of independent state power, the restriction of the sovereign power and introduction of a cabinet system, the abolishment of status system, publishment of newspapers, population census, and so forth.
As the extreme restriction of the sovereign power endangered the privileged status of the Enlightenment Group members into danger, they could not but restore the sovereign power in nation-state building after the King's flight to Russian Legation in February, 1896. Hence, it happened that the leading group of the Independence Club pursued a constitutional monarchy, while the Emperor an absolute monarchy. The desire of the Independence Club, however, broke down, as it was disorganized by the Emperor's Guards.
The policies of sovereign power build-up after 1899 brought a Korean-version of "Bonapartism" into existence. But, it frustrated the nation-state building project because it reduced the sovereign power into a private dimension, as the political and social power group exploited and suppressed the people. Hence, it created a "subject" which had only an obligation of loyalty and obedience without the rights to life and property, so that it was only natural that Korean people failed to unite as a nation in protest against the Japan's invasion. After the Russo-Japanese war, as a corollary, some crucial agendas of several politica1 groups that asserted the constitutional monarchy, "spouted" from the desire to deny this sovereign power.
lnitially, the principles of state building introduced in the Kabo Reform was to restrict the sovereign power to the extreme and create a new type of homogeneous people that were supposed to be loyal to the sovereign and patriotic to the state at the Same time. For that purpose, several projects were carried out: the establishment and proclamation of independent state power, the restriction of the sovereign power and introduction of a cabinet system, the abolishment of status system, publishment of newspapers, population census, and so forth.
As the extreme restriction of the sovereign power endangered the privileged status of the Enlightenment Group members into danger, they could not but restore the sovereign power in nation-state building after the King's flight to Russian Legation in February, 1896. Hence, it happened that the leading group of the Independence Club pursued a constitutional monarchy, while the Emperor an absolute monarchy. The desire of the Independence Club, however, broke down, as it was disorganized by the Emperor's Guards.
The policies of sovereign power build-up after 1899 brought a Korean-version of "Bonapartism" into existence. But, it frustrated the nation-state building project because it reduced the sovereign power into a private dimension, as the political and social power group exploited and suppressed the people. Hence, it created a "subject" which had only an obligation of loyalty and obedience without the rights to life and property, so that it was only natural that Korean people failed to unite as a nation in protest against the Japan's invasion. After the Russo-Japanese war, as a corollary, some crucial agendas of several politica1 groups that asserted the constitutional monarchy, "spouted" from the desire to deny this sovereign power.
목차
머리말
1. 국민국가 체제의 도입과 왕권의 위축
2. 입헌군주제와 전제군주제 구상간의 갈등
3. 전제군주제의 성립과 국민국가 구상의 좌절
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[특집1 : 한국 근대국민국가 형성과 왕권] 한국 근대국민국가 수립과정에서 왕권의 역할(1880 ~ 1894)
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
金允植의 外交論에 대한 國際法的 검토
한국인물사연구
2015 .09
-
불교위경의 정치적 특징에 대한 재고 －인도·중국불교의 통섭적 이해의 도모－
종교연구
2020 .08
-
Volatile Biopolitics : Postwar Korean Cinema’s Bodily Encounter with the Cold War
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2015 .06
-
주권 국가의 재검토
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1995 .10
-
한국과 조선: 한조관계의 역사·이론·방향 - 남북관계의 종식을 위하여
동방학지
2020 .01
-
신라 上代의 稟主와 內省-國家 및 王室의 財政構造 變遷을 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2001 .06
-
《漢武帝內傳》에 반영된 君主觀
중국어문논역총간
2016 .01
-
What Power
Korea Journal
1972 .12
-
Sovereignty, Biopower, Immunity: Racialized Bodies in Robinson Crusoe
영어영문학21
2020 .01
-
근대의학 담론이 ‘한센병’에 미친 영향 - ‘한하운의 텍스트를 중심으로’ -
한국문학논총
2019 .01
-
조선시대 對日本 國書의 서술 전략과 정치적 함의 - 일본의 대조선 국서와 비교하여
고전문학연구
2014 .01
-
니체의 ‘위대한 정치’와 삶의 예술
열린정신 인문학연구
2012 .06
-
Characteristic of the Council of Nobles in Silla, and Its Transformation
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2003 .12
-
자유주의 국제질서의 균열과 러시아의 주권적 국제주의
슬라브硏究
2019 .01
-
『신학정치론』에 전개된 종교와 정치의 관계
철학탐구
2019 .05
-
Stages of Nation Building in Asia
Korea Journal
1971 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[반론] 한국 근대사 연구의 오래된 도식과 편견 - 『역사와 현실』53호 도면회 교수의 서평에 대한 반론 -
서영희
역사와현실
2004
.12
을사조약은 어떻게 기억되어 왔는가?
도면회
역사와현실
2007
.12
[사실, 이렇게 본다 2] 「대한국국제」와 대한제국의 정치구조
도면회
내일을 여는 역사
2004
.09
개화기 '禮治'로부터 '法治'로의 사상적 전환 : 미완의 '大韓國國制體制'와 그 성격
이원택
정치사상연구
2008
.11
일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ : 윤해동 저, 『지배와 자치』(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평
지수걸
역사와현실
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013726151