지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The memory of the 1905 Convention has been changed. Around 1910, it was remembered as an evidence showing the incapability of Korean people as well as an entrance into the loss of sovereignty. During the Japanese occupation, it was regarded not only as an important moment of Korea’s degeneration into Japan’s colony, but also as a turning point which invoked the student strikes, the suicides of Young-whan Min and others, the ‘Righteous Armies’ of Ik-hyeon Choi, Jong-sik Min and others. The memories from 1945 to 1970s can be classified into three types. The first type stressed Japan’s outrage, coercion, and threat against Korean government. The second one stressed the incapability and lack of sense of responsibility of the ruling class. The third one stressed incapability and helplessness of the Korean nation as a whole. But, since 1980s the memory type which laid the blame on the side of Korean nation almost disappeared. Instead, Japan’s armed threat and coercion have been blamed. At the same time, the 1905 Convention was generally remembered as an momentum of Korean national movement against Japanese rule. Furthermore, recent studies from the view of international law reveals that the 1905 Convention was invalid.
Meanwhile, Wan-yong Lee and Young-whan Min were symbolized as an ‘traitor’ and a ‘patriot’ respectively. Nevertheless, several facts have been buried in oblivion in relation to the 1905 Convention: the ambiguous attitude of Emperor Gojong, the supreme ruler, before and after the conclusion of the 1905 Convention, the diverse politic behavior of the Korean officials which could not be identified in the dichotomy between traitor and patriot, the acts of many traitors except Wan-yong Lee, the fact that the 1905 Convention brought into completion the East Asian imperialist structure around Japan.
Meanwhile, Wan-yong Lee and Young-whan Min were symbolized as an ‘traitor’ and a ‘patriot’ respectively. Nevertheless, several facts have been buried in oblivion in relation to the 1905 Convention: the ambiguous attitude of Emperor Gojong, the supreme ruler, before and after the conclusion of the 1905 Convention, the diverse politic behavior of the Korean officials which could not be identified in the dichotomy between traitor and patriot, the acts of many traitors except Wan-yong Lee, the fact that the 1905 Convention brought into completion the East Asian imperialist structure around Japan.
목차
머리말
1. 을사조약에 대한 기억의 변화
2. 을사조약을 통한 ‘매국노’ㆍ‘애국자’ 상의 창출
3. 망각되어온 사실들
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
을사조약 이후 대한제국 집권세력의 정세인식과 대응방안
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
Transparency and Node Generation Convention
음성음운형태론연구
1995 .12
-
L2 Learners’ Specialized Vocabulary Knowledge in ESP Texts
언어과학
2014 .01
-
을사조약 이후 미주 한인단체의 국내정세 인식
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
Korean Studies in Japan
Korea Journal
1985 .12
-
On the Universality of a Tone Association Convention
언어
1981 .12
-
문화다양성협약과 지구지역성
세계문학비교연구
2013 .01
-
대한제국 성립기 재일본 망명자 집단의 활동(1895~1900)
역사와현실
2011 .09
-
Korean Studies Research in Japan
Korea Journal
1992 .06
-
1905년 「保護條約」에 대한 高宗皇帝의 協商指示說 批判
역사학보
2005 .03
-
을사조약 이후 청국정부의 한국인식
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
National Memory and Identity of the Working Class in Korea (1910 1950)
International Journal of Korean History
2000 .12
-
잡지 『조선』(1908~1911)에 나타난 간도ㆍ만주 담론
아시아문화연구
2010 .09
-
김원일 소설의 ‘기억’과 ‘회상’ 연구
우리문학연구
2013 .06
-
社員 池圭植의 러일전쟁과 을사조약을 둘러싼 시국 인식
한국인물사연구
2012 .03
-
무인정권, 그리고 전란 속의 왕권 : 고려 고종(1192-1259) 연구
한국인물사연구
2009 .09
-
재일본조선인연맹 ‘제5회 전체대회’에 대한 소고
한일관계사연구
2006 .10
-
高宗의 헤이그특사 파견과 국내항일투쟁
한국독립운동사연구
2007 .12
-
특사 태프트의 제2차 대일방문과 미일조약체제, 1907~1908 : 한국병합을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2010 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210190