메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김지인 (서울대학교)
저널정보
글로벌교육연구학회 글로벌교육연구 글로벌교육연구 제16권 제3호
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
139 - 162 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Theoretical research on global citizenship education (GCE) suggested that how forms and typologies of GCE are diverse following by the theoretical approach, contents, and pedagogies, however, little is known about how different types of GCE is shaping student’s understanding of GC. This study fills the knowledge lacuna by examining how students’ GC is differently sharpened by different typologies of GCE among Korean secondary school students using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data. Using latent class analysis, a four-class typology of GCE learning groups was identified, consisting of non-GCE learners, knowledge-based GCE learners, knowledge and perspectives-based GCE learners, and knowledge, perspectives, and engagement-based GCE learners. The results also proved that students with knowledge, perspectives, and engagement-based GCE are more likely to have high self-efficacy on global issues, global-mindedness, and more participation in GC activities compared to students who experienced only knowledge-based GCE. This study is worthwhile by empirically demonstrating the typology of GCE and providing evidence of why diverse forms of GCE should be highlighted rather than the delivery of knowledge.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0