메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
주민호 (경북대학교)
저널정보
경북대학교 IT와 법 연구소 IT와 법연구 IT와 법연구 제29호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
131 - 160 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the 'legitimate interests' of the opt-out method as a legitimacy requirement of the Personal Information Protection Act from the perspective of expanding the use of personal information. With the development of ICT technology, consent as a legitimacy requirement has certain limitations, and processing personal information with consent within the scope of a specific purpose in the processing of big data by artificial intelligence is equivalent to giving up the de facto benefits. After obtaining the legitimacy requirements of consent and legitimate interest, and summarizing the rights of each data subject, it can be seen that 'legitimate interest' is superior as a requirement of legitimacy from the perspective of the data processor, and the scope of personal information processing is wider by not limiting the scope of purpose compared to consent, and as an accompanying requirement, the EU stipulates that the data processing can be reasonably expected based on the relationship between the data processor and the customer. It also recognizes technical safeguards as an important sentencing factor by allowing additional safeguards to be taken into account in the sentencing assessment to balance the potential interests of the data controller and data subject. 'Legitimate interest' has equal status with other legitimacy requirements and is relatively flexible, but requires a balancing of the interests of the data controller and data subject. Clarifying the penal component of the penalty test by specifying the penalty that is being requested can help ensure that it is a preferred option for data controllers over consent. This would serve to crystallize an unstructured 'legitimate interest' that is not limited to the flexibility of the sentencing regulation, which also allows the relationship between the parties to be fluid.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0