지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Based on the records of Gaozi(around the 4th century BC) in Mencius as research materials, the paper makes a textual research on Gaozi’s theory of human nature. Combined with the ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts such as the thoughts of Mencius(372 BC-289 BC) and Xunzi(313 BC-238 BC), as well as the representative theories of human nature in Western philosophy, the paper analyzes the characteristics, status, and influences of Gaozi’s theory of human nature, and it also reveals the implications for the present day. Gaozi believed that human nature was the innate nature of human beings, which was driven by human instinct, namely, to discuss human nature from the natural attributes of human beings. During the pre-Qin period, Mencius and Xunzi proposed to judge human nature by the criteria of “good” and “evil”. In fact, “good” and “evil” belong to the realm of morality. The natures of “good” and “evil” change with the times and people’s subjective thoughts. In a purely natural state, there is no “good” and “evil”. Ideologists after Qin dynasty also used “good and evil” to evaluate human nature.
Gaozi advocated that “there is no good and no evil in human nature”, aiming to show that human nature cannot be judged by “good” or “evil”. From the debates between Mencius and Gaozi, it can be seen that Gaozi’s theory of human nature has three characteristics. First, plasticity, namely, people will be affected by acquired external environment, education and other factors, which means the social attributes of human nature will be good or evil. Second, adaptability, that is, human beings can adapt to changes in the external environment. Third, development, which means, human nature is constantly developing and evolving. There are no works written by Gaozi himself, making it difficult to verify him and his thoughts. However, it is commendable that Gaozi’s theory of human nature was not influenced by political factors, and he discussed human nature from a very objective and straightforward perspective, which had a profound impact on future philosophical thoughts. The influences greatly enriched the discussions of human nature in the history of ancient Chinese philosophy. The enlightenments of Gaozi’s theory of human nature to present era are as follows: Firstly, people’s external behaviors should be consistent with their inner moral concepts, so that the external appearance corresponds to the inside; secondly, the unity of opposites between good and evil promotes the developments of human beings, and Gaozi’s theory of human nature has advanced the developments of ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts.
Gaozi advocated that “there is no good and no evil in human nature”, aiming to show that human nature cannot be judged by “good” or “evil”. From the debates between Mencius and Gaozi, it can be seen that Gaozi’s theory of human nature has three characteristics. First, plasticity, namely, people will be affected by acquired external environment, education and other factors, which means the social attributes of human nature will be good or evil. Second, adaptability, that is, human beings can adapt to changes in the external environment. Third, development, which means, human nature is constantly developing and evolving. There are no works written by Gaozi himself, making it difficult to verify him and his thoughts. However, it is commendable that Gaozi’s theory of human nature was not influenced by political factors, and he discussed human nature from a very objective and straightforward perspective, which had a profound impact on future philosophical thoughts. The influences greatly enriched the discussions of human nature in the history of ancient Chinese philosophy. The enlightenments of Gaozi’s theory of human nature to present era are as follows: Firstly, people’s external behaviors should be consistent with their inner moral concepts, so that the external appearance corresponds to the inside; secondly, the unity of opposites between good and evil promotes the developments of human beings, and Gaozi’s theory of human nature has advanced the developments of ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts.
목차
Ⅰ. 引言
Ⅱ. “人性”的概念
Ⅲ. 中國古代哲學思想中的人性論
Ⅳ. 告子人性論的特徵
Ⅴ. 告子人性論的影響
Ⅵ. 結語
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
악은 선으로 부터만 정의 된다: 유학에서의 악의 정의 방향
인격교육
2021 .02
-
양웅의 선악론
도덕윤리과교육
2018 .11
-
한국인의 자연관 형성 배경과 그 특징에 대한 이론적 고찰
생물교육
2017 .01
-
휴먼인가?포스트휴먼인가?
인문사회 21
2019 .01
-
환경인권과 환경자연권리 - 생태주의 관점에서 본 환경인권 발전의 이론적 고찰 -
외법논집
2022 .08
-
애니메이션 <센과 치히로의 행방불명>에 나타난 인간과 자연의 관계 회복 필요성 고찰
일본근대학연구
2022 .05
-
주자학에서 리와 악의 관계
인격교육
2020 .01
-
荀子와 王充의 自然天 사상의 특징 고찰
퇴계학논총
2020 .01
-
참과학과 자연 연결의 측면에서 자연기반학습의 의미 탐색을 위한 실행 연구
생물교육
2022 .06
-
新常态下公共政策的核心在于洞悉人性
Journal of China Studies
2016 .01
-
陸賈의 人性論에 관한 硏究
퇴계학논총
2016 .12
-
佛敎와 人權- 원효사상을 중심으로 -
한국교수불자연합학회지
2020 .01
-
도덕적 환경주의를 넘어선 환경 인식의 지리교육적 의미 탐색
사회과교육
2024 .09
-
인간 본성에 대한 연구
한국교수불자연합학회지
2019 .01
-
인공지능이 침범하지 말아야 인간의 고유영역에 대한 탐색
로고스경영연구
2020 .12
-
<주례(周禮)>의 체제와 유교이념
퇴계학논총
2016 .12
-
인류세를 위한 초･중등 학교지리에서 사회(인간)-자연 관계의 대안적 인식 방향 탐색
한국지역지리학회지
2023 .02
-
인문학 텍스트에 나타난 기계에 중독된 인간의 미래상
한국중독범죄학회보
2019 .01
-
법에서 인간의 위상 － 존 피니스의 논의를 중심으로 －
안암법학
2020 .01
-
친환경 대공간 건축물의 자연 모방 디자인에 관한 연구
주거환경
2016 .06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0