지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 179 - 225 (47page)
- DOI
- 10.69596/JLL.2024.06.90.179
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article discusses the nature of business activity as a prerequisite for the application of the Act on Temporary Agency Work. In Germany, the Act, which has been in force since 1 December 2011, stipulates that “a wording of part of business activity”, i.e. the nature of business activity is one of the criteria for the application of the Act on Temporary Agency Work, instead of the previous wording of the commercial nature. The purpose of this legislation is to implement ｢Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work｣ into national law. The Act on the Protection, etc of Temporary Agency Workers expresses it as ‘for gain’, in contrast to the Act on Temporary Agency Work.
This paper takes a closer look at the definition of the nature of business activity as outlined above. The nature of business activity is a concept that is based on commercial purposes, and the former is a concept that encompasses the latter. Accordingly, unless there are exceptional circumstances, the nature of business activity should be determined on the basis of commercial purposes. In addition, if a corporation engages in activities that do not essentially deviate from the business objectives set forth in its articles of association, it is presumed that the corporation is engaged in business activities, and the fact that the temporary agency work is not carried out as part of business activities is an unusual circumstance as a rule of thumb, and therefore, it is appropriate for the party claiming the unusual circumstance to deny it by proving a non-profit or public interest purpose.
Furthermore, this article provides a detailed analysis of the exceptions to the Act on Temporary Agency Work, as laid down in Section 1(3) of the Act, in relation to the nature of the business activity.
Based on the above consideration of the specific meaning and content of business activity under the Act on Temporary Agency Work, it is necessary to interpret “a wording of for gain” under the Act on the Protection, etc of Temporary Agency Workers according to two factors of continuity and commercial purposes. This is because the wording ‘for gain’ is equivalent to a commercial purpose of the Old Act on Temporary Agency Work. In addition, this article proposes the following amendment to subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act on the Protection, etc of Temporary Agency Workers. It also proposed the deletion of Article 20 (1) 11 of the Act.
2. The term “temporary work agency business” refers to the provision of temporary agency work by temporary work agencies as part of their business activity, including for commercial purposes.
This paper takes a closer look at the definition of the nature of business activity as outlined above. The nature of business activity is a concept that is based on commercial purposes, and the former is a concept that encompasses the latter. Accordingly, unless there are exceptional circumstances, the nature of business activity should be determined on the basis of commercial purposes. In addition, if a corporation engages in activities that do not essentially deviate from the business objectives set forth in its articles of association, it is presumed that the corporation is engaged in business activities, and the fact that the temporary agency work is not carried out as part of business activities is an unusual circumstance as a rule of thumb, and therefore, it is appropriate for the party claiming the unusual circumstance to deny it by proving a non-profit or public interest purpose.
Furthermore, this article provides a detailed analysis of the exceptions to the Act on Temporary Agency Work, as laid down in Section 1(3) of the Act, in relation to the nature of the business activity.
Based on the above consideration of the specific meaning and content of business activity under the Act on Temporary Agency Work, it is necessary to interpret “a wording of for gain” under the Act on the Protection, etc of Temporary Agency Workers according to two factors of continuity and commercial purposes. This is because the wording ‘for gain’ is equivalent to a commercial purpose of the Old Act on Temporary Agency Work. In addition, this article proposes the following amendment to subparagraph 2 of Article 2 of the Act on the Protection, etc of Temporary Agency Workers. It also proposed the deletion of Article 20 (1) 11 of the Act.
2. The term “temporary work agency business” refers to the provision of temporary agency work by temporary work agencies as part of their business activity, including for commercial purposes.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경제활동성의 의의 및 내용
Ⅲ. 경제활동성과 파견법 적용 예외
Ⅳ. 우리 파견법상 ‘업(業)으로’에 관한 비판적 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현행법상 파견근로자 보호에 관한 법적 쟁점과 개선방안
강원법학
2017 .10
-
근로자 파견 법리의 불법구조와 분석 - 파견과 도급의 구별 기준 정립을 위한 시론 -
노동법포럼
2018 .07
-
한·중 근로자파견제도에 관한 소고
법학연구
2019 .01
-
파견법상 근로자파견 대가에 관한 연구
산업관계연구
2023 .06
-
가설건축물 관련 행정소송의 주요 쟁점과 입법론
행정판례연구
2023 .06
-
파견법위반죄의 구성요건에 대한 연구 : 파견과 도급의 구별기준을 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
｢派遣｣という働き方の日本的特徴と課題
일본근대학연구
2016 .01
-
The Impact of Demand Shock on the Employment of Temporary Agency Workers: Evidence from Japan during the Global Financial Crisis
Seoul Journal of Economics
2015 .01
-
한국의 파견근로자에 관한 차별시정제도와 사례
노동법논총
2017 .12
-
파견노동 및 현행 파견법의 문제점과 법적 과제
민주법학
2016 .11
-
독일 파견법상 파견근로의 개념과 판단 법리
노동법논총
2024 .12
-
근로자의 고용 안정을 위한 고용보험의 과제
노동법학
2015 .03
-
온라인 소비자 리뷰의 법률문제 : 소비자의 표현의 자유와 사업자의 명예보호 및 인터넷 사업자의 책임 사이의 충돌 문제를 중심으로
언론과법
2015 .08
-
자동차 제조 간접공정에서 파견과 도급의 구별 ―대상판결: 서울고등법원 2022. 1. 28. 선고 2020나 2008508, 2020나2008515(병합) 판결―
노동법포럼
2022 .11
-
전문직 비정규직이 팀 내 수용 및 창의적 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구: 경계 없는 비정규직과 과도기적 비정규직을 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2020 .01
-
중소 제조사업체의 파견관계 특성과 파견사업체의 이윤전략 - 안산ㆍ시흥스마트허브 지역내 전자, 기계업종을 중심으로 -
산업노동연구
2019 .01
-
파견근로자의 직접고용 근로자 전환시 근로조건 결정 기준
노동법논총
2024 .12
-
The Impact of E-Business on Activity Extension and Business Performance
유통과학연구
2020 .01
-
유럽연합 회원국들의 파견노동 지침 집행과 파견노동자 보호: 스웨덴과 스페인을 중심으로
스칸디나비아 연구
2016 .01
-
현행 ‘근로자파견 판단기준 지침’의 개선방안 연구 ―자동차 산업의 불법파견 판결 적용 사례를 중심으로―
노동법포럼
2022 .11
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089930865