메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이온순 (순천대학교) 조민영 (고려대학교)
저널정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소 교과교육학연구 교과교육학연구 제25권 제5호
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
315 - 325 (11page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As a language performance measure, accuracy has been considered a relatively consistent and unproblematic construct; however, accuracy can be assessed in a variety of ways, which may affect the results. This study examines how different measures of accuracy explain changes in task performance in the context of task repetition. Three different accuracy measures were explored: a rater’s holistic assessment, a frequency-based global measure of accuracy that counts all errors, and a specific measure of accuracy based on specific error types. Twenty-four EFL learners completed two picture narration tasks, repeating each task twice. They also completed a transcription activity between the two narration sessions, which functioned as an attention-drawing intervention and provided information on which specific error types to examine in the specific measure of accuracy. The learners’ picture narrations were analyzed, and the effects of task repetition examined, using each of the different accuracy measures. Findings showed different results by measures; specifically, improvement in accuracy was observed only through the holistic measure, while no evidence of improvement was found through the global and specific measures. These findings suggest that a holistic measure of accuracy offers a useful supplement to other measures for gauging the effectiveness of task-based language teaching.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0