메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김보혁 (신한대학교)
저널정보
동국대학교 비교법문화연구원 비교법연구 비교법연구 제22권 제3호
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
165 - 200 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The usurping of corporate opportunity doctrine is a specific case of a director's duty of loyalty in which the interests of the company should be prioritized when a director has a conflict of interest with the company. There has been theoretical conflict over the manner in which duty of loyalty has been included in Article 323-3 of the Commercial Act. Even though Article 397-2 of the Commercial Act prohibits the misuse of opportunities and assets by directors of business groups, the vagueness of the provision has not been resolved. The reality is that cases of misappropriation of opportunities by controlling shareholders in business groups have not been handled effectively. Therefore, there are few arguments as to how to solve this issue. One is that the criteria for what a “business opportunity” is should be stated more clearly in the law, and for big business groups, the scope of business opportunity should be applied to the entire business group rather than a single corporation. Another argument is that due to the absence of a controlling shareholder's duty of loyalty within the law, it is hard to implement Article 397-2 to regulate controlling shareholder’s usurping of corporate opportunity. In conjunction with these arguments, this thesis will also argue that the introduction of more bright-line rules like the ALI on fiduciary duties for directors and controlling shareholders is required to regulate usurping corporate opportunity cases in South Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0