메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이송희 (고려대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2023년 봄호(통권 제142호)
발행연도
2023.2
수록면
316 - 348 (33page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2023.02.142.316

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The primary goal of late Joseon intellectuals was to establish the identity of “Joseon Chunghwa” and fill the void left by the fallen Ming dynasty in China. However, this proved to be a challenging task for the kingdom located outside mainland China. Despite the efforts of the literati to bridge the gap between Joseon culture and the ideal Chunghwa by aligning its rites and institutions, the differences in geography and customs between the idealized China and Korea were evident.
In an attempt to provide concrete evidence of Korean Chunghwa, some intellectuals tried to prove that the Korean peninsula shared the geographical characteristics of mainland China. This trend in Korean geography and history was part of the larger effort to support the idea of Korean Chunghwa in late Joseon. However, when Western knowledge of the round earth was introduced and the belief in the geographic center of China was challenged, the idea of geographical-based Korean Chunghwa also faltered.
An alternative approach was the moral-based one. The idea was that if a society’s agents could reach their full ethical potential, then it would achieve cultural Chunghwa. Local customs and institutions were undeniable in Korea, but ethical behaviors could reach a universal value not limited by temporal or regional conditions. The Nakron school, which developed its theoretical position to subdivide the process of moral agency and expand the range of agents, especially advocated that the universal merit of reason and the human mind could be the basis for Chunghwa.
However, the idea was met with controversy when applied to Qing China, as Qing could been also recognized as the rightful Chunghwa in the same way, which was highly opposed by Joseon literati. is disagreement is exemplified by the controversy surrounding Hong Daeyong, who rejected the geographical-based idea of Chunghwa in favor of the cultural one, causing conict among his friends and colleagues.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 조선 후기 중화관의 내적 긴장
3. 심성(心性)인가 풍기(風氣)인가
4. 풍기적 중화관과 문화적 중화관의 충돌
5. 나가며
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-905-000452715