메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정병설 (서울대)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2016년 가을호(통권 제116호)
발행연도
2016.8
수록면
250 - 276 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Corrections to Joseon history books published in Ming-Qing China was a major diplomatic issue during the entire Joseon Dynasty. In the earliest years of Joseon, the government repeatedly sent envoys to China requesting correction of the error in the Huangming zuxun 皇明祖訓 (Instructions of the Ancestor of the August Ming) - admonitions left by the Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang, the founder of the Ming, to his descendants. The admonitions wrongly characterized the descendants of King Taejo, the founder of Joseon dynasty, as traitors. In the late Joseon, the government focused on correcting the Injo Banjeong records-the 1623 military coup d’etat in Joseon-in the Liangchao Congxinlu 兩朝從信錄, Huangming Shiliuchao Guanghuiji 皇明十六朝廣彙紀, Huangming Tongji 皇明通紀, Mingjijilue 明紀輯略 and other unofficial histories of the Ming Dynasty, where Injo Banjeong was wrongly described as an act of treason. The Joseon government repeatedly sent envoys to urge a halt to the circulation of such books. Joseon, as a Confucian nation, differentiated between the culturally defined Chinese Hua 華 and the cultural or ethnic outsiders Yi 夷. Joseon affiliated itself with and referred to the Ming Dynasty as Hua 華, and considered the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty as the barbarians Yi 夷. Therefore, errors in the official records of the Ming Dynasty had to be corrected in order for Joseon to become a dignified member of the Sinocentric world. There was no such need for correcting errors in Qing Dynasty official records. Nevertheless, the correction of Yi 夷 Qing Dynasty histories was still of great importance to Joseon since they could also have been passed down through generations. The correction of Ming Dynasty histories was not only linked to Joseon’s national security, but was also of considerable cultural significance. The less important correction of the Qing Dynasty histories was an object of much controversy and, in time, the act of such corrections became formalized.

목차

서론
1. 조선 전기의 사활적 변무
2. 조선 후기의 대내용 변무
결론 - 대중국 역사변무의 의미
Abstract

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-000983281