개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第161輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 263 - 297 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2022.12.161.263
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since ancient times, freshwater pearls have been the signature specialty of Manchuria. The Manchus used tana and nicuhe to distinguish pearls, so while tana was a name derived from the Mongolian language, nicuhe was an indigenous term in the Manchu language. In the process of being influenced by the Mongolian language, it is assumed that the name differentiation was made so that tana denotes a high-grade pearl and nicuhe denotes a less valuable pearl. On the other hand, in historical materials in Chinese classics, the name changed according to the location of the place of consumption and the place of production. Pearls produced in Manchuria were called "beizhu" in the Song dynasty, but the name was changed to "dongzhu" in the Ming dynasty due to the changing position of the Song and Ming dynasties to the manchuria. After that, in the Qing period, the Manchu word tana and the Chinese word dongzhu were established corresponding to each other.
Dongzhu gained prominence as a highly valued commodity at the end of the Ming dynasty. The huge profits that could be accumulated by trading dongzhu and other natural resources of Manchuria with the Ming dynasty, on the one hand, evoked the fierce competition of Jurchen"s forces, but on the other hand, it also served as a detonator that promoted the amalgamation of forces. Nurhaci was able to establish the Manju Gurun by succeeding in the concession struggle over dongzhu. The unification of Manchuria by Nurhaci at the end of the 16th century and the subsequent establishment of the Manju Gurun, in other words, is the result of the politics of an aggressive trade in popular commodities such as dongzhu.
The imperial court of the Qing dynasty consumed pearls for a variety of uses. The most frequent examples are the gifts of the monarch. Nurhaci and Hongtaiji gave pearls to the military commander who submitted to them. At the same time, when the princes of the royal family got married, the princes and son-in-law were given pearls. Widely used as gifts to be sent abroad, pearls were also sent to warlords of hostile countries and the Mongol chieftaincy. Pearls were also used in the court robes of the Qing dynasty, and only a small number of people were allowed to wear dongzhu in their court robes.
The Qing dynasty initially authorized only the powerful classes of the state to extract pearls and other natural resources of Manchuria. But Nurhaci gradually begins to recover these privileges. Measures taken in 1622 made private appropriation of natural resources impossible and shifted the responsibility for their management to the state. Such a measure would seem to imply a shift to a monarch-centric system that would deprive the powerful of their vested privileges, but an immediate understanding of this shift as monarch-centric requires a more cautious approach. The elites of the Qing dynasty still participated in the collection of natural resources like pearls, and their authority was recognized by the state.
Dongzhu gained prominence as a highly valued commodity at the end of the Ming dynasty. The huge profits that could be accumulated by trading dongzhu and other natural resources of Manchuria with the Ming dynasty, on the one hand, evoked the fierce competition of Jurchen"s forces, but on the other hand, it also served as a detonator that promoted the amalgamation of forces. Nurhaci was able to establish the Manju Gurun by succeeding in the concession struggle over dongzhu. The unification of Manchuria by Nurhaci at the end of the 16th century and the subsequent establishment of the Manju Gurun, in other words, is the result of the politics of an aggressive trade in popular commodities such as dongzhu.
The imperial court of the Qing dynasty consumed pearls for a variety of uses. The most frequent examples are the gifts of the monarch. Nurhaci and Hongtaiji gave pearls to the military commander who submitted to them. At the same time, when the princes of the royal family got married, the princes and son-in-law were given pearls. Widely used as gifts to be sent abroad, pearls were also sent to warlords of hostile countries and the Mongol chieftaincy. Pearls were also used in the court robes of the Qing dynasty, and only a small number of people were allowed to wear dongzhu in their court robes.
The Qing dynasty initially authorized only the powerful classes of the state to extract pearls and other natural resources of Manchuria. But Nurhaci gradually begins to recover these privileges. Measures taken in 1622 made private appropriation of natural resources impossible and shifted the responsibility for their management to the state. Such a measure would seem to imply a shift to a monarch-centric system that would deprive the powerful of their vested privileges, but an immediate understanding of this shift as monarch-centric requires a more cautious approach. The elites of the Qing dynasty still participated in the collection of natural resources like pearls, and their authority was recognized by the state.
목차
1. 문제의 소재
2. 만주산 진주의 명칭 분화
3. 누르하치의 발흥과 東珠의 이권
4. 만주 황실의 진주 소비와 그 특징
5. 八旗制 하의 東珠 채취와 재분배
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
入關前 淸朝의 議政大臣 설치와 皇帝·旗王 관계
동양사학연구
2021 .12
-
額赫里의 檔案으로 보는 청·러 국경분쟁 초기 漢軍八旗軍 상황과 조선을 통한 문제 해결
동아인문학
2018 .09
-
소현세자의 2차 귀국을 통해 본 도르곤의 對조선 전략
동양사학연구
2022 .09
-
The Rule of Hong Taiji and the Use of Policies toward Joseon
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2023 .12
-
中韓“无极太极”論辯之比較研硏究
한국학논집
2019 .12
-
清代 滿洲 多種族 공동체의 형성과 정체성: 만주 족보의 族源 기록을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2020 .10
-
1635-36년 後金의 政變과 汗-버일러 관계의 변화: 병자호란 발발의 배경과 관련하여
동아문화
2024 .06
-
병자호란 전야 외교 접촉의 실상과 청의 기만 작전, 그리고 『청태종실록』의 기록 조작
동양사학연구
2020 .03
-
栗谷의 太極論 硏究
율곡학연구
2018 .01
-
정묘호란의 동인 재고
열상고전연구
2020 .01
-
한국 뉴미디어 ‘판다’ 관련 담화에 대한 긍정적 담화분석
중국조선어문
2024 .09
-
淸初 만주 흥기 속의 잉굴다이
인문과학연구
2022 .06
-
한 · 일 뱃기 장식 비교 연구
민속연구
2017 .08
-
고려에 下嫁해 온 몽골공주들의 정치적 위치와 고려-몽골 관계: 齊國大長公主의 사례를 중심으로
이화사학연구
2017 .01
-
고조선시기의 우리 말《서울》의 의미
중국조선어문
2019 .05
-
병자호란과 천연두
민족문화연구
2016 .01
-
청말(1907∼1911) 길림성의 旗地 정돈과 旗人 생계의 도모
동양사학연구
2020 .09
-
‘적성(赤城)’으로 글쓰기
이화어문논집
2019 .01
-
漢語“赤/紅”係列與韓國語“붉다/빨갛다”係列顏色詞的詞源、構詞及認知語義分析
중국어문학논집
2023 .12
-
遼人에서 旗人으로 - 淸代의 漢軍旗人 李永芳 일족의 사례를 중심으로 -
역사와 세계
2024 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-910-000391609