메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
노기호 (군산대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제33권 제3집(통권 제79집)
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
21 - 40 (20page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2022.5.33.3.21

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The legal relationship between the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the unification provisions of Article 4 of the Constitution can be interpreted harmoniously with the provisions of Article 4 depending on how the meaning of the provisions of Article 3 is understood. If Article 3 is interpreted from the viewpoint of viewing North Korea as an illegal organization, as the Supreme Court"s opinion, the conflict with Article 4 is normatively unavoidable, and the only way to resolve this is to revise the Constitution. In the end, it is said that the way to utilize the normative power of the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the meaning of the peaceful unification provisions of Article 4 to pursue a constitutional unification policy depends on how to understand the meaning of the territorial provisions of Article 3. While acknowledging the stark reality of the existence of North Korea occupying a certain area of the Korean Peninsula, in order to preserve the normative power of the clause “The territory of the Republic of Korea consists of the Korean Peninsula and its annexed islands”, the meaning of territory in this clause should be interpreted in international law.In foreign relations, it should be interpreted that the scope of the territory of the Republic of Korea has been declared, and that although North Korea occupies a certain area of the Korean Peninsula in the future, the scope of the territory of a unified Korea in the future is the same as in Article 3.
It is necessary to look at the scope of the normative power of territorial provisions in external international legal relations and internal inter-Korean relations. Externally, the normative power of the territorial provisions of Article 3 extends to the Korean Peninsula, but internally, it must be seen that it does not reach the North Korean region.
Normative power up to the North Korean region should be considered to be realized after a unified Korea. As long as it is interpreted in this way, there will be no conflict between the territorial provisions of Article 3 and the provisions of Article 4 of peaceful reunification. The most practical way to solve the problem without resorting to such an interpretation is to re-establish Article 3 of the territorial provisions through constitutional revision and to prepare a reunification plan similar to that of West Germany in the constitution.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 남북한 관계에서 영토조항의 법적 의미
Ⅲ. 남북한 관계에서 통일조항의 법적 의미
Ⅳ. 영토조항과 통일조항의 관계
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0