지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 133 (133page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The culture impact assessment introduced in 2013 by framework act on culture. The cultural impact assessment system refers to a system in which the government and local governments identify and consider the impact on the quality of life of the people in terms of culture when they formulate plans or policies. The purpose of system enhances the social value by culture. Central and local governments have to conduct the cultural impact assessment before establishing the policy.
Government operated pilot assessment period from 2014 and to 2015. The official assessment began in 2016. The Seoul Metropolitan Government has a same issue. The Seoul Metropolitan Government developed the index for cultural impact assessment in 2015. The Seoul Metropolitan Government passed the city ordinance about cultural city and conducting the assessment, independently. The Seoul Metropolitan Government is not actively utilizing the policy. The Seoul Metropolitan Government conducted two evaluations in 2018 and 2019, respectively.
The Seoul Metropolitan Government stand at the crossroads to activate the assessment. One is to use and fit the framework of central government. And the other is to create the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s own style. The Seoul Metropolitan Government does not need to prepare the method, independently, as the Seoul Metropolitan Government follows the central government. Since most of the cultural impact assessments are based on cultural city projects, it is difficult for the Seoul Metropolitan Government, which does not carry out the cultural impact assessment. If the Seoul Metropolitan Government establish the Seoul Metropolitan Government‘s own plan or policy by the law, the Seoul Metropolitan Government should create a pre-assessment frame.
The Seoul Metropolitan Government need to improve purpose of assessment and index for creating the own system. Unlike the central government, which aims to spread cultural values, the Seoul Metropolitan Government should adjust its cultural aspects to assess the impact on citizens" quality of life and cultural diversity. The Seoul Metropolitan Government should adjust to a system that measures daily life, community, diversity, etc. based on the original cultural concepts. The evaluation targets shall be based on the quality of life of citizens and their impact on the community. In addition, it is necessary to ensure that evaluations are made when various plans and policies are implemented. In addition, cultural impact assessment should be naturally spread to general policies by providing incentives for continuous education of civil servants and policies that implement the assessment. Based on the above information, the report presents the actual conditions of the Seoul Metropolitan Government"s cultural impact assessment and measures to implement it.
Government operated pilot assessment period from 2014 and to 2015. The official assessment began in 2016. The Seoul Metropolitan Government has a same issue. The Seoul Metropolitan Government developed the index for cultural impact assessment in 2015. The Seoul Metropolitan Government passed the city ordinance about cultural city and conducting the assessment, independently. The Seoul Metropolitan Government is not actively utilizing the policy. The Seoul Metropolitan Government conducted two evaluations in 2018 and 2019, respectively.
The Seoul Metropolitan Government stand at the crossroads to activate the assessment. One is to use and fit the framework of central government. And the other is to create the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s own style. The Seoul Metropolitan Government does not need to prepare the method, independently, as the Seoul Metropolitan Government follows the central government. Since most of the cultural impact assessments are based on cultural city projects, it is difficult for the Seoul Metropolitan Government, which does not carry out the cultural impact assessment. If the Seoul Metropolitan Government establish the Seoul Metropolitan Government‘s own plan or policy by the law, the Seoul Metropolitan Government should create a pre-assessment frame.
The Seoul Metropolitan Government need to improve purpose of assessment and index for creating the own system. Unlike the central government, which aims to spread cultural values, the Seoul Metropolitan Government should adjust its cultural aspects to assess the impact on citizens" quality of life and cultural diversity. The Seoul Metropolitan Government should adjust to a system that measures daily life, community, diversity, etc. based on the original cultural concepts. The evaluation targets shall be based on the quality of life of citizens and their impact on the community. In addition, it is necessary to ensure that evaluations are made when various plans and policies are implemented. In addition, cultural impact assessment should be naturally spread to general policies by providing incentives for continuous education of civil servants and policies that implement the assessment. Based on the above information, the report presents the actual conditions of the Seoul Metropolitan Government"s cultural impact assessment and measures to implement it.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
[목차]
표 목차
그림 목차
[01. 연구개요]
1_연구배경과 목적
2_연구내용과 방법
[02. 문화영향평가 운영현황]
1_제도체계
2_추진현황
3_지방자치단체 추진현황
4_서울시 추진현황
[03. 문화영향평가의 주요 현안과 논점]
1_주요 이슈
2_문화영향평가의 주요한 논점과 서울시 실행 시사점
3_종합 및 방향 모색
[04. 다른 영향평가제도 운영현황과 시사점]
1_분석 개요
2_규제형 평가 유형 사례
3_규범형 평가 유형 사례
4_종합 및 시사점
[05. 서울시 문화영향평가 시행방안 토론]
1_전문가 세미나
2_전문가 및 공무원 대상 설문조사
3_조사결과 요약과 시사점
[06. 서울시 문화영향평가 시행방안]
1_기본방향
2_서울형 문화영향평가제 시행방안
3_평가 시행 및 활성화 방안
[07. 논의결과 종합 및 결론]
1) 7년간 시행된 문화영향평가 제도, 문제가 해결되기보다는 더 꼬여
2) 서울시 문화영향평가 시행을 위해서는 서로 다른 평가목적부터 조정해야
3) 모호한 지표체계, 문화와 예술이 혼재된 평가체계도 문제
4) 평가시행 및 활성화를 위해선 긴 기간을 보고 평가시스템을 갖추어야
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[Abstract]
[Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
4차 산업혁명과 새로운 산업발전 공간정책 방향: 플랫폼 전략의 적용 검토
한국지역지리학회지
2020 .08
-
서울시 생활권계획의 활용과 운영 방향
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2017 .11
-
2단계 재정분권 추진에 따른 서울시 재정운영 전략
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2021 .11
-
서울시 노동정책 전략사업
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .12
-
스마트도시의 사회적 쟁점과 서울시 정책과제
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2018 .12
-
서울시 민선자치 20년 회고와 전망 : 시민중심의 지방분권 실현 위한 역할과 과제
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2016 .01
-
서울시 광역중심 기능진단과 육성방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2019 .02
-
서울시 노동정책 발전전략
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .07
-
역대정부의 인구분산정책에 대한 고찰: 수도권을 중심으로
한국행정사학지
2020 .01
-
전자정부 이용이 정부신뢰에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 매개효과 탐색을 중심으로
한국행정논집
2018 .06
-
서울시 북한이탈주민 지원정책 개선방향
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2022 .11
-
정부의 내부 관리역량과 외부 관리역량이 정부성과에 미치는 영향: 전자정부의 역량에 대한 조절효과를 중심으로
융합사회와 공공정책
2021 .11
-
Improving the Public Value in Government Program: The Case of Korean Government 3.0 Model
국정관리연구
2017 .01
-
정부 간 로비(Intergovernmental Lobby)-자치단체 서울사무소 운영 영향요인에 관한 탐색적 연구-
한국지방자치학회보
2020 .09
-
서울시 희망기업제품 구매정책의 효과 분석
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .12
-
Study on the Korean application of cultural accessibility and cultural arts education: focusing on French cultural policy
분석과 대안
2024 .02
-
대도시권의 성장이 국토균형발전에 미치는 영향분석
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2018 .11
-
공공디자인 관련 조례 제정 동향 및 함의 - 광역지방자치단체 조례를 중심으로 -
도시디자인저널
2022 .12
-
지방재정 투자사업 심사체계 개선방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2020 .04
-
광역·도시철도 네트워크 확장의 파급효과와 서울시 대응방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-359-000150438