지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 140 (140page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The population of North Korean refugees living in Seoul is the largest among metropolitan cities and the second largest among upper-level local autonomies (including Do-provinces). In contrast, the living standard of North Korean refugees living in Seoul is relatively lower than the rest of the nation. The economically inactive population rate of North Korean refugees in Seoul is 41.4%, compared to the national rate of 34.1%. The rate of Households with no employment is 35.2%, compared to the national rate of 29%. Livelihood Benefit Recipient and Medical Benefits Recipient rates reach 26.9% and 38.7%, respectively.
Although this is the case, North Korean refugees living in Seoul lacked government-funded support to increase their independence and self-reliance because they have exceeded the settlement support period (5 years). About 88% of the refugees in Seoul have settled for more than 10 years.
Seoul Metropolitan Government is obligated by law to play a more active role. According to Article 4-2 of the ‘North Korean Refugees Protection and Settlement Support Act’, the Seoul Metropolitan Government is obligated to promote continuous support for protection, education, employment, and medical care for the successful settlement of North Korean refugees. Article 3 of the ‘Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Settlement Support for North Korean Refugees’ also stipulates that the Mayor of Seoul should continuously support North Korean Refugees so that they could be successfully settled in the local communities. The Mayor of Seoul, as the head of upper-level local government, is also the ‘Head of Residential Protection’ responsible for supporting the settlement, self-reliance, and social integration of North Korean Refugees in Seoul. However, in reality, the role of SMG has been a formality, due to the centralized support system. Also, the current government"s information-sharing system for North Korean Refugees is segmented, which makes it difficult to predict crises and link services at the local level. Although each district has a residential protection officer and a regional council, the level of operation was different and lacked a practical cooperative system between working-level officials and protection officers. Therefore, we propose the following recommendations to improve Seoul’s Policy for Supporting North Korean Refugees in Seoul. First, the current policy plan should be amended to clarify its direction and purpose and to increase its effectiveness. Secondly, policy programs to support ‘employment & start-ups’ and ‘medical care’ should be strengthened. Thirdly, more customized policies and programs considering the characteristics of North Korean refugees living in Seoul should be implemented to increase self-support, independence, and social integration. Lastly, to identify the complex problems in the vulnerable and crisis households of North Korean refugees in Seoul, the “Seoul Metropolitan Government Checklist for Emotional and Psychological Stability, Vulnerability, and Crisis Status”, needs to be implemented along with the current government system. This checklist includes social isolation, safety and health, economic and living, stress, depression, and anxiety factors.
Although this is the case, North Korean refugees living in Seoul lacked government-funded support to increase their independence and self-reliance because they have exceeded the settlement support period (5 years). About 88% of the refugees in Seoul have settled for more than 10 years.
Seoul Metropolitan Government is obligated by law to play a more active role. According to Article 4-2 of the ‘North Korean Refugees Protection and Settlement Support Act’, the Seoul Metropolitan Government is obligated to promote continuous support for protection, education, employment, and medical care for the successful settlement of North Korean refugees. Article 3 of the ‘Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Settlement Support for North Korean Refugees’ also stipulates that the Mayor of Seoul should continuously support North Korean Refugees so that they could be successfully settled in the local communities. The Mayor of Seoul, as the head of upper-level local government, is also the ‘Head of Residential Protection’ responsible for supporting the settlement, self-reliance, and social integration of North Korean Refugees in Seoul. However, in reality, the role of SMG has been a formality, due to the centralized support system. Also, the current government"s information-sharing system for North Korean Refugees is segmented, which makes it difficult to predict crises and link services at the local level. Although each district has a residential protection officer and a regional council, the level of operation was different and lacked a practical cooperative system between working-level officials and protection officers. Therefore, we propose the following recommendations to improve Seoul’s Policy for Supporting North Korean Refugees in Seoul. First, the current policy plan should be amended to clarify its direction and purpose and to increase its effectiveness. Secondly, policy programs to support ‘employment & start-ups’ and ‘medical care’ should be strengthened. Thirdly, more customized policies and programs considering the characteristics of North Korean refugees living in Seoul should be implemented to increase self-support, independence, and social integration. Lastly, to identify the complex problems in the vulnerable and crisis households of North Korean refugees in Seoul, the “Seoul Metropolitan Government Checklist for Emotional and Psychological Stability, Vulnerability, and Crisis Status”, needs to be implemented along with the current government system. This checklist includes social isolation, safety and health, economic and living, stress, depression, and anxiety factors.
목차
[표지]
[요약]
[목차]
표 목차
그림 목차
[01. 서론]
1_연구배경 및 목적
2_연구내용 및 방법
[02. 서울시 북한이탈주민의 의미와 지원정책 필요성]
1_북한이탈주민의 의미와 용어 변화
2_서울시 북한이탈주민 지원 정책 필요성과 기대효과
[03. 서울시 북한이탈주민 정착 및 지원 현황]
1_서울시 북한이탈주민 정착 현황
2_서울시 북한이탈주민 지원체계 및 정책
[04. 국내 북한이탈주민 지원 정책 사례 분석]
1_정부의 북한이탈주민 지원 정책
2_타지자체의 북한이탈주민 지원 정책
[05. 서울시 북한이탈주민 지원 정책 개선방안]
1_서울시의 북한이탈주민 정착지원 책임과 역할
2_서울시 북한이탈주민 지원계획 개선 방향 및 추가사업 제안
3_서울시 북한이탈주민 취약·위기가구 정보 체크리스트 제안
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[Contents]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한이탈주민은 서울에서 어떻게 살고 있을까 - 주거정착을 중심으로 -
주거환경
2021 .06
-
경기도 북한이탈주민 생활문화교류를 위한 인프라 구축 방안
정책연구
2020 .11
-
재영 북한 이주민의 영국 난민정책 경험과 그 함의
통일연구
2019 .01
-
North Korean Refugee Integration Policy in South Korea: Human Security Challenges
Asian International Studies Review
2021 .05
-
한국과 세계 난민 실태와 현황 비교연구
다문화사회와 교육연구
2019 .01
-
사회보장법으로서 북한이탈주민지원법의 일고찰 : 헌재 2017.8.31.자 2015헌가22 결정 (헌공 제251호)을 소재로
사회보장법학
2017 .12
-
An Investigation into the Educational Experiences of North Korean Refugees in China in Light of Their Exposure to Human Rights Violations
Journal of Multicultural Society : OMNES
2017 .07
-
중국거주 탈북자 난민인정 문제와 한국의 난민정책
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국제학술회의
2017 .11
-
북한이탈주민의 사회자본과 남한사회 적응에 관한 종단적 분석(2017-2021)
연구총서
2022 .12
-
1997-2013년 북한이탈주민 지원정책 변동 분석 : 정책네트워크 모형을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2016 .11
-
현장전문가가 지각하는 북한이탈주민의 가족관계 특성에 대한 질적 연구
한국가족관계학회지
2020 .01
-
Korea's Practice on Refugee Protection: Focusing on the Refugee Act and Relevant Court Cases
Pacific Focus
2024 .04
-
Legal Socialization: A Comparative Study between North Korean refugees and South Koreans
한국경찰학회보
2021 .12
-
대구지역 북한이탈주민의 효과적 지역정착 지원체계 : 굿 거버넌스 구축을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
북한 공로자년금의 제도와 실태에 관한 연구
통일과 평화
2018 .01
-
Refugee Scenarios of North Korea's Sudden Regime Change
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-359-000376176