메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이진경 (부경대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제71집
발행연도
2022.6
수록면
153 - 169 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In order to understand ‘the essence of 「NODA」’ among the issues discussed in research on 「NODA」 such as essence, the use of various functions, relations of alternants, and relevance to grammatical categories, this study reviews ‘Yoshinao Najima’s research (2007)’. This is theoretically grounded on 「Relevance Theory」 applying pragmatic perspectives to linguistics and is focused on the analysis that has realized inferences through humans’ cognitive processes. The fruition of Yoshinao Najima’s 「NODA」 research (2007) can be said to be ‘the approach to essence’, ‘functions drawn in the process of inference’, and ‘the suggestion of prerequisites in the use of NODA’. This result plays crucial roles in figuring out the essence of 「NODA」, but we should consider several points as below.
First, since there is no clear definition or lack of explanation about terms, some parts are hard to understand. One of the representative examples is 「context」. In analyzing 「NODA」, it is important to understand ‘relevance with the prior context’. In fact, misunderstanding the dictionary definition of ‘context’, some mistakenly think it as ‘sentences appearing previously and afterwards’. In such cases, it is impossible to explain 「NODA」 in accidental circumstances. Therefore, this study suggests the new ways of using terms regarding such errorneous terms (「context」→『cognitive environment』, 「contextual effect」→『cognitive effect』, 「contextual implication」→『addition』, 「contradiction and eliminating」→『scavenging』, 「postulation」→『assumption』).
Second, there is lack of explanation over ‘essential functions’ and ‘message-delivering functions’. Explicit explanation is given in the functions of ≪explanation≫ and ≪discovery≫ ; however, regarding ≪command, emphasis, and indirect response≫, it may be inferred in each of the functions but the judgment cannot be made certainly as it is not explicit.
Third, concerning the types in which 「NODA」 should be used essentially, the criteria of use and the essence of 「NODA」 are presented as ‘accidental and unexpected discovery, simultaneous verbalization, and schemata in situations equipped with low similarity’; however, about the rest types (the cases equipped with high permissibility and those that can be simply omitted), no explanation is given in detail.
It is important to find out essential elements in the use of 「NODA」; however, unless we resolve doubts about why it is permitted or why it is used even if it can be just simply omitted, it is hard to approach the essence of 「NODA」. Solving this problem would be the factor to figure out the substance of 「NODA」, and this author suggests it as the task to be handled in follow-up research.

목차

Ⅰ. 연구목적
Ⅱ. 「関連性理論」의 흐름
Ⅲ. 「ノダ」연구에 대한 「関連性理論」의 필요성
Ⅳ. 名嶋義直(2007)의 「ノダ」연구에 대한 재검토
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0