지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제50호
- 발행연도
- 2022.4
- 수록면
- 123 - 140 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2022.4.50.123
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article revisits the use of γύναι in the Johannine Gospel (2:4; 19:26), and asks why Jesus addresses his mother as woman from the literary context perspective. Eugene Nida had long argued that γύναι was a common highly respectful address form for mother. But Gert Knepper argues, “Nida for long time did not realize the real problem with γύναι.” Recently Vitaly Voinov tried to rebut Knepper’s argument. He also argues for translating γύναι as mother in the light of pragmatics and corpus analysis.
But the article shows that within exegetical research, the use of γύναι is recognized as a symbol by means of two criteria, conventional plausibility and textual plausibility, which Ruben Zimmermann suggested to identify symbols. Symbols are only defined by way of the conventions of a linguistic community, and can only be recognized through evidence from the text itself.
Γύναι is a recurring image throughout the Gospel. It is named for the sake of inclusio at the first sign and the last. Γύναι has a traditional, compositional-technical, theological function within the literary work, which is characterized as a woman who gives birth to a child like the Old Testament themes of Lady Zion’s giving birth to her offspring. Γύναι is not an expression of proper filial respect. Within the literary context of the Gospel of John, γύνη represents those who bear the words of Jesus and witness the death of Jesus as his love caring for his own to the end (cf. 13:1). The Gospel of John, therefore, applies this tenor of expression to Jesus’ mother in relation with the beloved disciples, who constitute the new family of faith and are now called brothers (20:17). The writer argues as Knepper does, “under no circumstances should γύναι be translated with a term meaning mother.”
But the article shows that within exegetical research, the use of γύναι is recognized as a symbol by means of two criteria, conventional plausibility and textual plausibility, which Ruben Zimmermann suggested to identify symbols. Symbols are only defined by way of the conventions of a linguistic community, and can only be recognized through evidence from the text itself.
Γύναι is a recurring image throughout the Gospel. It is named for the sake of inclusio at the first sign and the last. Γύναι has a traditional, compositional-technical, theological function within the literary work, which is characterized as a woman who gives birth to a child like the Old Testament themes of Lady Zion’s giving birth to her offspring. Γύναι is not an expression of proper filial respect. Within the literary context of the Gospel of John, γύνη represents those who bear the words of Jesus and witness the death of Jesus as his love caring for his own to the end (cf. 13:1). The Gospel of John, therefore, applies this tenor of expression to Jesus’ mother in relation with the beloved disciples, who constitute the new family of faith and are now called brothers (20:17). The writer argues as Knepper does, “under no circumstances should γύναι be translated with a term meaning mother.”
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. γύναι 이해
3. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Revisiting Vocative γύναι in John 2:4 : A Plea for Linguistic Realism
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
바울의 비유로서의 “세례” 용어 - βαπτισθῆναι εἰς τι/τινα 해석 문제를 중심으로
신약논단
2025 .03
-
요한복음에서 오순절의 자리
Canon&Culture
2021 .04
-
The Relationship between the Prologue (John 1:1-18) and Body of the Gospel of John
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
요한복음 1-12장에 나타난 P66과 P75의 용례 분석
신약연구
2015 .06
-
나다나엘이 보게 될 “더 큰 일들”(요 1:50)의 의미
신약논단
2020 .12
-
A Text-Critical Analysis of John 7:53–8:11 with a Focus on Its Stylistic Discontinuity
성경원문연구
2024 .10
-
Creation and Sovereignty: The Translation and Early Reception of John 1:3
Canon&Culture
2021 .10
-
What Does John’s Gospel Say about the NPP?
Hapshin Theological Review
2016 .12
-
요한복음 8:12-59 에 대한 수사학적 분석
TORCH TRINITY Journal
2017 .07
-
NPP에 대한 요한복음의 평가
신학정론
2016 .05
-
요한의 구조 읽기: 요한식 병행법의 이해와 해석학적 의미
신약연구
2019 .01
-
생수의 강 - 요한복음 4:14; 7:37-38
신학사상
2019 .01
-
요한복음의 이사야서 인용에 대한 상호텍스트성 연구
신약논단
2019 .09
-
요한복음의 새 창조 모티프: 표적, 십자가와 부활, 성전
신약연구
2017 .01
-
숫자 17과 큰 물고기 153표적(요 21:11)의 의미
Canon&Culture
2019 .04
-
나를 따라 오너라 : 성경본문/ 요한복음 12:20-26
세계와선교
2015 .03
-
요한복음 6장 35절의 목마름 언어에 대한 의미 재고
신약연구
2019 .01
-
Did John Know the Synoptic Gospels?
신약연구
2015 .12
-
요한복음 19장 14절의 “제육시”에 대한 연구
개신논집
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
고린도전서 15:45의 이해와 해석에 대한 제안 — “살아 있는 육신”인 아담과 “살려 주는 영”인 그리스도 —
김의창
성경원문연구
2023
.04
마가복음의 어린아이 이야기의 주된 주제에 대한 고찰 — παιδίον의 의미와 마가복음 10:15의 문장구조 이해를 중심으로 —
김서준
성경원문연구
2023
.04
성서 히브리어 발음 교육을 위한 제언 — 자음 명칭을 중심으로 —
김지명
성경원문연구
2023
.04
“왜 악인들이 살아있는가?(מַדּוּעַ רְשָׁעִים יִחְיוּ)”에 대한 사회학적 해석 — 욥기 21:7-16을 중심으로 —
조한근
성경원문연구
2023
.04
『새한글성경 신약과 시편』의 국어학적 의의
민현식
성경원문연구
2022
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0