지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제55호
- 발행연도
- 2024.10
- 수록면
- 163 - 196 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2024.10.55.163
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
John 7:53–8:11, the pericope of the woman caught in adultery, is a well-known text-critical issue in the New Testament. The originality of this pericope as part of John’s Gospel has long been investigated by biblical scholars. Most contemporary biblical scholars argue that the pericope of the woman caught in adultery was not an original composition of John’s Gospel. NTG28 and GNT5 both identify John 7:53–8:11 not only as a later addition to the original Greek text by placing double square brackets around the passage but also as a nonsignificant variant for textual reconstruction by providing a negative apparatus and assigning the A rating in the apparatus. Almost all translations indicate John 7:53–8:11 to be a non-original text through various means. Recent commentaries on John’s Gospel generally deny the possibility of John 7:53–8:11 being part of the original part. On the other hand, some textual critics still hold to the Johannine originality of John 7:53–8:11 and offer various textual evidence.
However, the extant studies of both views only focus on whether John 7:53–8:11 can fit into the broader context of John’s Gospel but fail to examine the stylistic continuity of the pericope with its co-text. According to the principle of modern linguistics, it is the co-text of John 7:53–8:11, as its immediate linguistic context, that serves as the primary determinant for the Johannine authenticity of the pericope. This paper conducts a text-critical analysis on John 7:53–8:11, adopting reasoned eclecticism to evaluate both external and internal evidence and paying particular attention to whether the pericope demonstrates the stylistic continuity with its co-text. Based on this analysis, the paper argues that John 7:53–8:11 has no canonical authority. Since this text-critical analysis is conducted for the purpose of reconstructing the original Greek text of the New Testament, this paper proposes that John 7:53–8:11 should be removed from the text of John’s Gospel in the Greek New Testament and modern translations. As the non-canonical text, the pericope remaining in its usual place interrupts the Tabernacles discourse in John’s Gospel and will mislead contemporary readers. Given the fact that John 7:53–8:11 has been included in the New Testament for such a long history, the pericope can be placed in a footnote at the end of the Gospel with the textual note indicating its non-Johannine originality.
However, the extant studies of both views only focus on whether John 7:53–8:11 can fit into the broader context of John’s Gospel but fail to examine the stylistic continuity of the pericope with its co-text. According to the principle of modern linguistics, it is the co-text of John 7:53–8:11, as its immediate linguistic context, that serves as the primary determinant for the Johannine authenticity of the pericope. This paper conducts a text-critical analysis on John 7:53–8:11, adopting reasoned eclecticism to evaluate both external and internal evidence and paying particular attention to whether the pericope demonstrates the stylistic continuity with its co-text. Based on this analysis, the paper argues that John 7:53–8:11 has no canonical authority. Since this text-critical analysis is conducted for the purpose of reconstructing the original Greek text of the New Testament, this paper proposes that John 7:53–8:11 should be removed from the text of John’s Gospel in the Greek New Testament and modern translations. As the non-canonical text, the pericope remaining in its usual place interrupts the Tabernacles discourse in John’s Gospel and will mislead contemporary readers. Given the fact that John 7:53–8:11 has been included in the New Testament for such a long history, the pericope can be placed in a footnote at the end of the Gospel with the textual note indicating its non-Johannine originality.
목차
1. Introduction
2. A Survey of Scholarship
3. Methodology
4. Text-Critical Analysis
5. Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Relationship between the Prologue (John 1:1-18) and Body of the Gospel of John
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
요한복음 1-12장에 나타난 P66과 P75의 용례 분석
신약연구
2015 .06
-
What Does John’s Gospel Say about the NPP?
Hapshin Theological Review
2016 .12
-
The Johannine Authenticity of the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53-8:11)
Hapshin Theological Review
2018 .12
-
요한복음의 이사야서 인용에 대한 상호텍스트성 연구
신약논단
2019 .09
-
Did John Know the Synoptic Gospels?
신약연구
2015 .12
-
숫자 17과 큰 물고기 153표적(요 21:11)의 의미
Canon&Culture
2019 .04
-
요한의 구조 읽기: 요한식 병행법의 이해와 해석학적 의미
신약연구
2019 .01
-
“간음여자 단락”(요 7:53-8:11)의 요한복음 진정성
신학정론
2018 .06
-
요한일서 2:12-14에 나오는 세 호칭에 관한 연구
신약연구
2023 .06
-
존 로스 번역본 『예수셩교 요안복음젼셔』 초판(1882)의 ‘간음한 여인 이야기’ (요7:53 - 8:11) 삭제 문제
한국교회사학회지
2016 .05
-
나다나엘이 보게 될 “더 큰 일들”(요 1:50)의 의미
신약논단
2020 .12
-
요한복음에서 오순절의 자리
Canon&Culture
2021 .04
-
요한복음 15:18-16:4a에 따른 요한복음 5-10장의 메시지
신약논단
2020 .06
-
바울과 요한, 그리고 신약성서 신학의 다양성과 일치성
장신논단
2024 .06
-
『새한글성경 신약과 시편』 번역에 관한 제언 — 요한복음에 나타나는 독특한 표현들을 중심으로 —
성경원문연구
2022 .10
-
Lukan Endeavour to Reconstruct John the Baptizer in Conjunction with Jesus
신약논단
2015 .09
-
현대 미국에서의 흑백 인종간의 혼합과 (반)담론들
영어영문학연구
2020 .01
-
복음서의 “인자”(ὁ υἱὸς τοῡ ἀνθρώπου)에 대한 연구
신학연구
2020 .12
-
The Theological Significance of the First(ἀρχή) Sign in the Gospel of John
Hapshin Theological Review
2021 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-091063258