메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박강우 (충북대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
55 - 81 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In English Criminal Law, the clause on impossible attempt did not exist. But since 1980 there was a exuberant debate on how to legislate about the law on impossible attempt in the House of Lords and academics. The English-American Law divides impossible attempts into legal impossiblity and factual impossiblity and again real impossible attempts are divided to object, method and means impossible ones. Among theses attempts legal impossibility are viewed as non-punishable in Englsih Criminal Law, because of the deficiency of legal requirements to punish(nulla poena sine lege). Compared to clause on impossible attempts of English Criminal Law, that of Korean Criminal Law is unique, because impossible attempts clause in KCL ask to be riskness even if the result can not be occurred due to the error of object or means etc. But, the debate on impossible attempts in English Criminal Law can have important implication to KCL, because ECL has a tendency to deny the concept of impossible attempts owing to making much of the actor’s intent. The opposite tendency looked upon the object riskness for crime as important. So, in the R. v. Smith case, the English court decided the punishability by the object riskness not by actor’s intent. In this case, the defendant receive the corn beef that he clearly believed it to be stolen, but the goods he received were no longer stolen property. There not much similar cases on impossible attempt in Korean Criminal Cases. In KCC, there is a interesting case on impossible rape to trans-gender female(legally male), the two defendants attempted to rape trans-gender female, but they could not complete the rape because of the object of rape are legally male(At that time Korean Criminal Law ask to rape legally female to complete rape). In this case the Supreme Court affirmed the not-guilty conviction of appeal court, because of the object of the rape is not female. But, the riskness of rape crime in this crime is obvious, so the two defendants could be punished as impossible attempt of rape. So, in this paper I reviewed many theory and cases about impossible attempt, and proposed to ways to improve on impossible attempt in KCL.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0