메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이지연 (고려대학교)
저널정보
글로벌영어교육학회 Studies in English Education Studies in English Education Vol.23 No.3
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
739 - 768 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As of 2017, the Civil Service English Exam (CSEE) Grade 7 at the national level (G7.N) was replaced with these five EFL tests: TOEIC, TOEFL, TEPS, G-TELP and FLEX. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether the replacement of the CSEE G7.N with the five EFL tests is reasonable in terms of construct validity, authenticity and impact proposed by Bachman and Palmer. This study yielded three significant results. First, the five EFL tests did not satisfy the construct validity in order to be used as an alternative to the CSEE G7.N even though they are known to be a reliable measure of English proficiency. Second, in regards to the authenticity analysis of the five EFL tests, TOEFL and G-TELP were found to have the lowest degree of authenticity while TEPS and TOEIC both displayed a fairly high degree of authenticity. Finally, the results of the questionnaire survey on test takers’attitudes and perceptions regarding the EFL tests in general were found to indicate that the CSEE G7.N’s replacement with the five EFL tests may not bring a positive impact either on individual test takers or our society. The implications of this study suggest that based on the specific purpose and target population, rather than utilize the five EFL tests, the CSEE G7.N should be developed by including test items more related to civil servants’ job descriptions to fulfill the need for construct validity, authenticity, and positive impact both on candidates and society.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0