메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정경수 (숙명여자대학교)
저널정보
국제법평론회 국제법평론 국제법평론 제58호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
97 - 138 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The right to effective remedy begins in Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and is defined in major international human rights treaties that impose legal obligations on each state party to realize it. The treaties ensure an effective remedy against violations of various human rights available. Therefore, victims have the opportunities for restoring injury arising from human rights violations. Although the general principle of effective remedies was well established from the early formation of the international human rights law, the term “reparation” itself was not universally and generally established, and compensation was a dominant form in providing a remedy. There was no awareness of rehabilitation as a form of reparation. As a result, there was a limit in providing an effective relief appropriate to the characteristics of the injury suffered by torture survivors. The international courts and other human rights mechanisms have primarily approached torture victims remedy by calculating damages suffered by victims into pecuniary compensations.. Newly adopted treaties have specified rehabilitation as a form of reparation to be provided, and affected the interpretation and application of existing treaties on victims redress. Also, non-binding normative documents adopted by UN General Assembly and human rights treaty monitoring bodies have contributed to the elaboration of principles and guidelines on an effective remedy, in particular various forms and contents of reparation including rehabilitation. Such normative evolution has increased the possibility of adequate and effective remedies for full recovery from injuries. The normative evolution in victim relief has evolved to accommodate torture survivors. In particular, the normative foundation and contents on the provision of rehabilitation are prepared and presented to torture survivors. Therefore, the principles and guidelines of an effective relief for torture survivors can be incorporated and realized domestically. Rehabilitation as a way of reparation for torture survivors can be provided through indirect means of awarding damages to be compensated and should be realized by institutionalizing and implementing national systems and programs. The legal incorporation is in the judiciary and its realization depends on the legislature and the administration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0