메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송에스더 (고려대학교 법학연구원)
저널정보
서울대학교 아시아태평양법연구소 Journal of Korean Law Journal of Korean Law Vol.20 No.2
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
373 - 412 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On December 28 2015, South Korean and Japanese foreign ministers abruptly reached an agreement (hereinafter “the 2015 Agreement”) to settle the Korean “comfort women” issue. This agreement evoked strong opposition among the victims and civic groups due to the lack of participation by the victims in reaching it; consequently the agreement appeared to result in unjust reparations for these victims. In addition, two conflicting judgments were reached in the South Korean court in relation to compensating Korean “comfort women” in 2021; namely, (i) the judgment on January 8 2021 and (ii) the judgment on April 21 2021. In terms of the former, the Seoul Central District Court ruled on January 8 2021, that the victims’ right to claim reparations for damages against the Japanese government was not included within the scope of application of the 2015 Agreement. On the contrary, in its April 21 2021 ruling, the Seoul Central District Court dismissed the lawsuit on the ground of state immunity filed by other victims of Japanese military sexual slavery against the Japanese government. Besides, the court ruled that an “alternative remedy” was provided by the 2015 Agreement. This raises the question of if the 2015 Agreement provided adequate just reparations to be considered an “alternative remedy” for the victims. This article argues that the reparations the Japanese government provided to Korean “comfort women” cannot be regarded as just since it does not met the international standards of just reparations, especially from the perspective of transitional justice and international law. For this purpose, Section 2 discusses the background of the so-called “comfort women” and confirms the legal responsibility of the Japanese government. Section 3 explores the international standards on providing a remedy and reparations for victims of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. Then, it outlines what just reparation should be from the perspective of transitional justice. Section 4 examines whether the reparations the Japanese government offered these women, including those set out in the 2015 Agreement, constitute just reparations for the victims. Section 5 discusses the relationship between justice and politics in reparations for these victims and finds that justice in reparations for these women was determined by political considerations between the two countries. The implementation of the 2015 Agreement shows how difficult it is to achieve reconciliation between these two countries without just reparations.
#Reparations #Comfort Women #Sex Slave #Victim #Just Reparation #Compensation #Transitional Justice

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청
천자현 / 2015 / Beyond “Dissatisfaction” and “Apology Fatigue”: Four Types of Japanese Official Apology / Pacific Focus 30(2):249~269 Crossref

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0