지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第150輯
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 299 - 338 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2020.3.150.299
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The causes of tax abuses rising as serious social problem from middle Qianlong era consist of the illegal tribute grain surtaxing by local magistrates and the other illegal tax farming by local gentry. Originally these two causes were in a complementary relation but by the change of the echo-social environment this relation began to break so that social unrests like tax suing including capital appeal or the refusal to pay tribute grain culminating rebellion has risen up in Jiaqing-Daoguang era.
Tax abuses in Qing dynasty is supposed to occur in the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People. The people as the weakest ring in this structure could not but help depending on the gentry or going to the mountain, thus tax farming cannot be seen as a simple one-sided action for the people, while the capital appeal cannot be appreciated as a good way to resolve the problem of illegal surtaxing by the bureaucrats. The imbedded institutional defects in the system of capital appeal do not seem to make the rate of success in the capital appeal high.
The movement of the tax suing or the refusal to pay tribute grain by the lower gentry, which is superficially seen as movement for the cause of justice for the people, seems to have double-sidedness due to its position in the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People. Because the ring structure of B-G-P is constructed on the base of Big Tax Household-Small Tax Household relation, the reformation of tax abuse with the theory of Gentry-People Equalizing by Feng Guifen could not have performed well without considering the gentry’s will. Likewise the legal act in the society of the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People could not be considered as same as in the ‘litigious society’, which is proved by the fact that in China there never existed a lawyer as lawful before the modern era.
In this respect the rise of independent institution of tax farming(急公堂) for the people by their own in 1821 and the new interpretation by the protesting lower gentry of the strong law which has made the lawyers in China unlawful so many years are worthy of notice.
Tax abuses in Qing dynasty is supposed to occur in the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People. The people as the weakest ring in this structure could not but help depending on the gentry or going to the mountain, thus tax farming cannot be seen as a simple one-sided action for the people, while the capital appeal cannot be appreciated as a good way to resolve the problem of illegal surtaxing by the bureaucrats. The imbedded institutional defects in the system of capital appeal do not seem to make the rate of success in the capital appeal high.
The movement of the tax suing or the refusal to pay tribute grain by the lower gentry, which is superficially seen as movement for the cause of justice for the people, seems to have double-sidedness due to its position in the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People. Because the ring structure of B-G-P is constructed on the base of Big Tax Household-Small Tax Household relation, the reformation of tax abuse with the theory of Gentry-People Equalizing by Feng Guifen could not have performed well without considering the gentry’s will. Likewise the legal act in the society of the ring structure of Bureaucracy-Gentry-People could not be considered as same as in the ‘litigious society’, which is proved by the fact that in China there never existed a lawyer as lawful before the modern era.
In this respect the rise of independent institution of tax farming(急公堂) for the people by their own in 1821 and the new interpretation by the protesting lower gentry of the strong law which has made the lawyers in China unlawful so many years are worthy of notice.
목차
1. 문제
2. 漕弊의 구조: 浮收와 漕規
3. 包漕의 이중성
4. 衿棍의 告漕京控
5. 결어: 官-紳-民의 連鎖構造와 근대화
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 세제개편의 회고 및 전망 -1990년대 이후 세제개편을 중심으로-
한중관계연구
2015 .01
-
부동산 세제의 국제 비교와 시사점
유라시아연구
2019 .01
-
해방 이후 북한 조세개혁의 배경과 세목(稅目)의 변화 — 국세를 중심으로 —
사림
2020 .01
-
1950년대 후반 세제개혁과 미국 조세고문단의 활동
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
Analysis on Tax Benefits in China ― The Impact of Tax Benefits Reducing Disparity across Industries and Regions in China
중국학
2016 .01
-
中国田赋制度变迁的探讨
한중관계연구
2015 .01
-
해방 직후 북한의 재정·금융 상황과 임시 재정 대책
사학연구
2020 .06
-
Global Tax Policy Developments Related to Highly Digitalized Businesses
외국학연구
2018 .01
-
일제시기 ‘유흥세’ 운영의 추이와 특징
한국사연구
2019 .12
-
우리나라 조세지출의 소득재분배 효과 분석: 소득세 관련 항목을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
한중 부동산 관련 세법의 비교를 통한 중국 부동산 보유세 도입에 관한 연구 : <종합부동산세>와 <개인주택 부동산세 잠행방법>을 중심으로
인문사회과학연구
2022 .08
-
조세 및 재정에 대한 납세자들의 이해력에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석
유라시아연구
2021 .09
-
1934년 조선총독부 세무관서 설치 이후 조선인 세무관리-『직원록』에 수록된 1,159명 중 세무서장 등 간부급을 중심으로-
역사교육논집
2015 .01
-
고구려 후기의 부세체계와 유인(遊人)의 성격
역사와현실
2020 .09
-
러시아 조세제도 개혁 연구: 연결납세제도를 중심으로
슬라브硏究
2023 .06
-
세금의 공공성에 대한 교회의 이해와 실천
신학지남
2020 .03
-
17세기 漕軍의 입역 실태와 變通論議의 전개
동방학지
2024 .09
-
ESG 활동이 기업 조세혜택에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구
인문사회과학연구
2023 .08
-
1859~72년 장단(長湍) 상도면(上道面) 소지(所志)를 통해 본 조선 후기 부세 소송의 성격
사림
2024 .04
-
세무조사와 교회 재정 운용
교회와 법
2022 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-910-000513323