지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine the sanctification based on the experience of rebirth by comparing the views of Calvin and other scholars through John Owen’s Two Short Catechisms.
John Owen saw regeneration as God trying to sanctify people through the process of a newly transplanted life called “spirit.” John Owen considered rebirth purely the work of the Holy Spirit with no human will involved at all, everything being a very unique and special ministry of the Holy Spirit. This view unequivocally is contrary to the claims of Alminianists and Socinianists who believed the Holy Spirit is within the believers. And afterwards the Holy Spirit regenerates the believers.
Thus, John Owen understood the Holy Spirit as being within the believers for salvation and as the final stage of sanctification in this world. John Owen also saw regeneration as immediate and final. Simultaneously, John Owen emphasizes that the obligation of a justified believer is to “slaughter” sin, in the battle against sin, in order for the rebirth to be fully realized. This theology is unique to John Owen. By comparison most reformed theologians, including Calvin, emphasized a rebirth through faith, while John Owen emphasized it was the duty of believers to put sin to death.
Additionally, John Owen saw regeneration as a spiritual ministry resulting in sanctification. John Owen stated that a regenerated person would be obligated to practice good deeds for the glory of God by the absolute grace of God, and with a mind purified by faith according to Christ’s command. Sanctification is generally divided into progressive sanctification and immediate sanctification. John Owen accepted Calvin’s argument of gradual sanctification.
John Owen embraced the aspects of immediate and gradual sanctification simultaneously. Since he saw sanctification as a joint work between God and the believer, he understood the immediate aspect as the work of God, and the gradual aspect as the joint work of God and man. Thus sanctification, as proposed by John Owen, is experienced at rebirth, is obligatory for the believer and is given by the grace of God.
Therefore, Christians should have a balance of faith and life, and their aim should be in Christian sanctification. To this end, John Owen’s catechism can be a meaningful teaching for the Saints in balancing sanctification with those who have experienced regeneration.
John Owen saw regeneration as God trying to sanctify people through the process of a newly transplanted life called “spirit.” John Owen considered rebirth purely the work of the Holy Spirit with no human will involved at all, everything being a very unique and special ministry of the Holy Spirit. This view unequivocally is contrary to the claims of Alminianists and Socinianists who believed the Holy Spirit is within the believers. And afterwards the Holy Spirit regenerates the believers.
Thus, John Owen understood the Holy Spirit as being within the believers for salvation and as the final stage of sanctification in this world. John Owen also saw regeneration as immediate and final. Simultaneously, John Owen emphasizes that the obligation of a justified believer is to “slaughter” sin, in the battle against sin, in order for the rebirth to be fully realized. This theology is unique to John Owen. By comparison most reformed theologians, including Calvin, emphasized a rebirth through faith, while John Owen emphasized it was the duty of believers to put sin to death.
Additionally, John Owen saw regeneration as a spiritual ministry resulting in sanctification. John Owen stated that a regenerated person would be obligated to practice good deeds for the glory of God by the absolute grace of God, and with a mind purified by faith according to Christ’s command. Sanctification is generally divided into progressive sanctification and immediate sanctification. John Owen accepted Calvin’s argument of gradual sanctification.
John Owen embraced the aspects of immediate and gradual sanctification simultaneously. Since he saw sanctification as a joint work between God and the believer, he understood the immediate aspect as the work of God, and the gradual aspect as the joint work of God and man. Thus sanctification, as proposed by John Owen, is experienced at rebirth, is obligatory for the believer and is given by the grace of God.
Therefore, Christians should have a balance of faith and life, and their aim should be in Christian sanctification. To this end, John Owen’s catechism can be a meaningful teaching for the Saints in balancing sanctification with those who have experienced regeneration.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 하나님 형상회복으로서의 성화의 본질
Ⅲ. 성화의 순간성과 점진성
Ⅳ. 성화의 방편으로서의 거룩한 삶
Ⅴ. 중생에 근거한 성화
Ⅵ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Methodological Characteristics of Mortification in John Calvin and John Owen
ACTS 신학저널
2020 .01
-
“…and Yet be Loth to Die?” Death and Dying in the theologies of john Owen and Richard Baxter
Hapshin Theological Review
2018 .12
-
개혁파 신론을 변증하기 위한 알미니우스주의와의 투쟁: 존 오웬의 신학적 출발점
조직신학연구
2018 .01
-
존 오웬의 ‘영적 사고방식’ 연구 : ‘내면에 남아있는 죄’를 극복한 ‘영적 사고’의 형성과 유지를 중심으로
선교와 신학
2017 .10
-
계급의 비극: 게리 오웬의 『로미오와 줄리』 속 셰익스피어 변주
Shakespeare Review
2024 .10
-
“성령을 받으라”(요 20:22) －요한복음의 두 가지 성령 수여 약속의 통합 성취
신약논단
2019 .12
-
The Relationship between the Prologue (John 1:1-18) and Body of the Gospel of John
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
주권적 개인은 니체주의적 경합적 민주주의의 주체인가?
시대와 철학
2024 .06
-
A Text-Critical Analysis of John 7:53–8:11 with a Focus on Its Stylistic Discontinuity
성경원문연구
2024 .10
-
요한일서 2:12-14에 나오는 세 호칭에 관한 연구
신약연구
2023 .06
-
요한복음에서 오순절의 자리
Canon&Culture
2021 .04
-
John Calvin and the Korean Presbyterian Church
Hapshin Theological Review
2015 .12
-
숫자 17과 큰 물고기 153표적(요 21:11)의 의미
Canon&Culture
2019 .04
-
What Does John’s Gospel Say about the NPP?
Hapshin Theological Review
2016 .12
-
요한복음 1-12장에 나타난 P66과 P75의 용례 분석
신약연구
2015 .06
-
바울과 요한, 그리고 신약성서 신학의 다양성과 일치성
장신논단
2024 .06
-
요한복음의 이사야서 인용에 대한 상호텍스트성 연구
신약논단
2019 .09
-
‘요한복음의 하나님’에 대한 퍼포머티브-내러티브 비평적 분석 : "아버지’(πατήρ) 용어 사용을 중심으로
신약논단
2016 .06
-
요한복음 15:18-16:4a에 따른 요한복음 5-10장의 메시지
신약논단
2020 .06
-
Spiritual Practices of John Calvin: Worship and Prayer
TORCH TRINITY Journal
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-230-001308019