메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제32권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
199 - 250 (52page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently the government promulgated Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order on December 21, 2007, in order to execute efficiently delinquent fine. It announced that an amount in arrear shows a tendency to increase in every district because there are many cases that fine related to vehicles such as traffic and parking violation and for waste dumping is unpaid. Like this, the major cause of increase of an amount in arrear is that any additional dues or any disadvantages are not imposed on defaulters. After June 22, 2008, by the present Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order, delinquent fine for negligence for violations of public order payers will be disadvantaged. For example additional dues are imposed up to 77% of the unpaid fine for negligence. And their property can be attached by the delinquency disposition. However in reference to imposing a fine for negligence for administrative offenses against public order, similar regulations related to criminal tatbestand, illegality, tatbestand about criminal responsibility and joint principal offender and so on were legislated. It carries an important meaning to provide criminal crime tatbestand in the law of a fine for negligence which is a punishment for administrative offenses against public order that makes the necessary conditions for a fine for negligence precise. But administrative offenses against public order have been legislated taking criminal crime tatbestand. This seems to regard a fine for negligence as a punishment and the boundary between criminal punishment and administrative punishment for offenses against public order may be obscure. To fulfill duties efficiently at law and protect national rights and profits under the purpose clause of Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order, articles on conditions for completion of offenses against public order, fine for negligence imposition ․ collection and trial have been provided but I have doubts if it can truly protect national rights and profits. So in case of payment delinquency of a fine for negligence for administrative offenses against public order, the rapidity and the efficiency are too emphasized in Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order for collecting taxes which is the public purpose, therefore I raised the point at issue that this is an excess restriction as means for national safety device. When a fine for negligence is delinquent habitually and in a large amount, provisions about collection of additional dues, restriction of government-licensed business, offer information of defaulters to an organ of credit information and detention can infringe on property right and civil liberties(right of privacy and freedom of business), accordingly the legislator should continuously observe and revise that law. In public law, when legislatures make a law, it balances the public interest against the private interest. Also this issue is the principal of the proportion. It is the eternal issue about the law and the justice and the strict responsibility and duty that harass him to solve this problem wisely and without injustice to anyone. So the legislator should be always concerned about the sprit of the law, speculate modestly on human nature and rearm precisely the logic of the law and then he should make a law that can make trouble in the realities of law

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (56)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0