메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제30권 제1호
발행연도
2002.3
수록면
1 - 12 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to elicit high school students' views of the nature of science at ages 17 years. The survey subjects were 1,577 firsts of 18 high schools in southern part of Korea. Three research probes had been developed; that is, the scientific questions, the experiment, and the belief probe. Firstly, we have considered an aspect of how students characterize scientific activity and distinguish it from other activities. We did this by asking students to consider a range of questions and to judge those they considered to be scientific or not scientific, giving their reasons. Respondents tended to refer to three main features in justifying a classification of a question as a scientific question. Theses were empirical investigation, domain of phenomenon involving natural phenomena, and perceived personal and institutional characteristics of scientific work. Secondly, the experiment probe was designed to require students to elaborate on what they considered to be involved in an experiment. Students' judgements were based on two dimensions, the one was the nature of the finding out involved; that is, students referred to whether or not there was an investigative component involved. The other was the context of the activity; that is, whether the domain was perceived as scientific or whether the activity involved was associated with science. Finally, the belief probe explored the nature of the grounds students gave for accepting a scientific statement as true. In considering the overall picture, it is useful to divide the warrants based on evidence into two categories: those using direct perceptual evidence only, and those referring to more complex links between evidence and the given idea. Similarly, warrants based on authority fall into two groups: those based on blind acceptance of authority, and those which also provide some reasons for accepting the authority.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0