메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제37권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
321 - 334 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze the types of tables and the difficulty level of tabling activities according to science contents (energy, matter, life, earth) and grade levels (7th, 8th, 9th) implemented in the 9 editions of Korean middle school science textbooks. The results showed, first, that the table consisting of one independent variable and two or more dependent variables was most frequently used(45.1%). No correlation between grade levels and types of table used was observed. Second, there were table constructing activities (52.2%) and table interpreting activities (47.8%) with equal amount. Such interpreting activities were also found to be most frequently required for subjects relating to earth (34.7%) and life (28.0%), whereas constructing activities were more frequently required for subjects relating to energy (31.2%) and matter (27.9%). Both types of tabling activity was most frequently found at the 9th grade level. Lastly, interpreting activities of extracting information from data (53.8%) and interpreting activities of finding relationships in the data (45.0%) were most used in subjects related to life. Interpreting activities of applying and calculating from data were most used in subjects related to matter (39.4%). Furthermore, constructing activities with guidance of values of variables were most used for subjects related to life (31.8%) and constructing activities with guidance of variables were most used for subjects related to energy (33.6%) and matter (27.2%). Constructing activities without guidance were most used for subjects related to matter (75.0%). Also no relationship between activity levels and grade levels was observed for table interpreting and constructing activities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0