메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
315 - 326 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many attempts have been made to introduce history of science in science textbooks as an effective way of learning about science. It has been also reported that various modes of presenting history of science in textbooks occurred. However, the analysis method is not highly structured and its scope and depth are not taken into consideration. The study aims to investigate contents of history of science appeared among four ‘Life Science I’ textbooks for high schools developed according to 2009 Science Curriculum. The framework is characterized with three-dimensions of context (interest (I), conceptual (C), socio-cultural (S), and epistemological (E)), role (fundamental (F), complementary (C), and in-depth (I)), and kind (episodeanecdote (E), historical experiment (H), discovery/device (D), and linear evolution (L)). With this framework, four textbooks were analyzed. The results showed that the average amount of pages including the history of science is 10.9%. With the framework, there were 48 different types and ten types appeared in three textbooks at least while the rest 38 types were rarely used, implying limited ways of introducing contents of history of science to certain types. When themes of history of science were compared, context (C) - role (F) - kind (D) or (H) types are majority in ‘understanding life science’ and ‘continuity of life’ units and context (C) or (S) - role (C) - kind (D) types are majority in ‘homeostasis and health’ unit.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0