메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제10권 제2호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
105 - 126 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
When it comes to the market segmentation in the housing market, the aggregate models, i.e., the distinction of homogeneous housing submarkets, are only meaningful if the underlying phenomenon is homogeneous across the units of observation. Unless there is a homogeneous spatial process underlying the data, any aggregation will tend to be misleading. If this is not the case, both the heterogeneity and structural instability should be acconted for in an aggregation scheme. This aspect of modifiable area unit problem should be considered as a specification issue to the form of spatial heterogeneity, and not solely as an issue determined by the spatial organization of the data. For situations where one is trying to uncover the difference the stability of parameter between the housing submarkets, one is left with the question how to proceed. Then the Chow statistic will apear as the one of the various methods to tackle it on the assumptic homoskedasticity. Especially when it finds the with-in heteroskedasticy, the usage of critical values from the F-distribution is suspectecd, even if the average variance is the same across samples. The Wald test is more general and obviously applies under conditions of heteroskedasticity. Therefore, this paper focuse on the precise distinction of homogeneous housing submarkets with and without heteroskedasticity.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0