메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
237 - 291 (55page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Trust Act §42 prescribes a trustee's right to reimbursement. This right has been recognized in England and US by cases or statues. Article 42 of Trust Act of Korea follows the tradition. When a trustee did trust affairs for trust estate or a beneficiary, the trustee can request compensation the damage that it received without expense and without the fault during performing the affairs. This is a reflection of principle which is "the person make a profit on control of a business and bears the risk simultaneously" like a delegation(§688 (3) in Civil Law). When a trustee, who performs a trust affairs for the profit of the beneficiary solely, is charged with the debt to a trust creditor, he can claim the compensation against the trust estate or the beneficiary. Especially, trustee can be compensated by disposing a trust estate oneself prior to the different holder of a right(for example, a trust creditor). This article examines a few problems of a claim for this a trustee's right to reimbursement. First issue is a problem the right to reimbursement of priority to between the trust estate and the beneficiary. Second issue is a problem of the case compulsory execution where the trust estate is property other than the money. Especially the trustee can apply for a compulsory execution to trust estate while being in trustee's position. Third issue is the meaning of "other holder of a right" and the legal nature of the priority under the Trust Act § 42 (1). Forth issue is the problem of appropriateness about admitting the claim of compensation of the beneficiary, and the effect of a waiver of interests of the beneficiaries. Many opinion is existed in the effect of a waiver of the 'Interests of the beneficiaries' under the Trust Act §42 (3). In my view, it is allowed in both self-settled trust and non-self-settled trust. And in this case, the beneficiary escapes from the trustee's demand, or the right of indemnity based on the § 42 (2). But, in the case of non-self-settled trust, even if the beneficiary take a benefit of trust, his obligation which is already happened, is exempted form the trustee's the right of indemnity based on the § 42 (2) by the waiver of the 'Interests of the beneficiaries'.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0