메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제15권 제2호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
465 - 497 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The penalty surcharge is defined as a device against a violater of law to compel performance of a duty indirectly by deprivation of the business profits caused by violation of the administrative law. The Fair Trade Commission imposes a punitive surcharge on enterprisers' violation of the regulations such as abusive acts by a market-dominating enterpriser, prohibition of new debt guarantee for affiliated domestic company, restrictions on resale price maintenance, prohibition of cartel, prohibiton of unfair trade practices on Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. The surcharges may impose an enterpriser within the range not exceeding the multiplying 2~10% of the turnover determined by Presidential Decree. But liability for damages with no fault for consumers damaged from enterpriser, criminal punishment and corrective measure can be done at the same time. In addition, the criticism that the possibilities of double jeopardy or surplusage regulations of legal violations may be given has been raised. This paper examines the legal characterization of the penalty surcharges as the means of securing social fairness and inhibition of violative acts. And then we should seek transparency and fairness of surcharge imposition system of violations against the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0