메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역상무학회 무역상무연구 무역상무연구 제70권
발행연도
2016.5
수록면
41 - 67 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On 2013 the English court delivereda decision that the payment obligation under time charter party is a condition. According to this judgement, The Astra, a breach of the obligation to pay hire on time entitles the owner both towithdrawthe ship and sue the charterers for damages for the difference between the contract andmarket rate for theremainder of the contracted period.On2015, however,theEnglishcourtstoodattheother side. InSparShipping, thecourtconfirmed that the obligation to pay hire is not a condition of the contract but an “innominate term” - from the charterers breach ship owners can exercise their contractual right towithdraw, but owners’ right to sue for damages depends on whether the charterers have deprived the owners of the substantial benefit of the contract, or shown an intention to do so.This article aimstocompare both decisions over thepoints that (1) the importance of on-time payment under a time charter party, (2) as a critical andmain question in this article, whether themattered payment clause isa conditionor innominate term, (3)whether the on-time payment clause is merely a penalty or a reasonable liquidated damage.Based on various reasons, I amon a position that the payment of hire is not a condition but aninnominate term. Default in punctual payment by acharterer, in theabsent of clear contractual agreement, needs tobe decidedfurther whether that breach removes the substantial benefit of the contract from the owners.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-320-000236177