메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Imagination of Anachronism and Parallel-world in Choi In-Hoons Tempest
Recommendations
Search
Questions

최인훈의 『태풍』에 나타난 시대착오와 평행세계의 상상력

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Park, In-Sung (서울예술대학교)
Journal
The Institute for Humanities Humanities Studies East and West Vol.51 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.6
Pages
69 - 99 (31page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Imagination of Anachronism and Parallel-world in Choi In-Hoons Tempest
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This research aims at studying rhetoric expressions of intended anachronism and their effect in In-Hoon Choi’s novel, Tempest, regarding tendency in Choi’s works from 1970s. Within this purpose, both concepts of anachronism and synchronism will be discussed first. Then, the aspects of how temporality(zeitlichkeit) is working in narration of Tempest is going to be studied as well. Anachronism, in this case, rather means Choi’s intention to twist or dissolve historical and temporal awareness of a reality, temporality than indicates simple cognitive error.
Above all things, text of Tempest is important as a sort of pseudo-parallel world of The Square. This is not a parallel world in the true sense of the term, but a compromising result as it is a kind of attempt to constitute multi-self rather than multiverse. In Tempest, the main characteristic of The Square, Myung-June Lee, could have been able to choose a different choice by turning back time of 30 years. Within these contexts, the main characteristic of Tempest, Otomenak, accepted neither Korean one nor Japanese one but a thoroughly new identity, multi-faceted open identity. Temporal operation in Tempest was strongly connected to a matter of self-establishment that has still not been solved in inner structure of temporality of 1970s.
In Choi’s works, anachronism was a belated attempt for modernism design for synchronicity, as temporal operation, aiming at constituting totality of the world. In 1970s, eventually this attempt was no longer possible. As a result, while Choi directly dealt with temporality, a point of view of promenade was emphasized as a compromising result in A Day of Novelist Mr. Koo-bo’. Thereafter in Tempest, this unavoidable conclusion, that his attempts have been failed, created a new attempt to bend this failure into another success. In order to do this, Choi tried a parallel world, where there is going back in a 30 year period of time. On the one hand, it seems Choi made the best use of synchronism to handle temporality in a critical viewpoint, however, he has never overcome it as his attempts were tied down to dialectic of self-regulation.

Contents

국문초록
Ⅰ. 들어가며: 총체화의 욕망과 동시성의 시대착오
Ⅱ. 역사적 보충물로서의 시대착오
Ⅲ. 과거의 ‘다른 반복’으로서의 평행세계
Ⅳ. 동시성의 역사의식과 정초(定礎)의 변증법
Ⅴ. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract

References (12)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-001-000797555